Prev: Assumption of length contraction in original theory
Next: Dark Energy: The problem with Einstein's Cosmological Constant is that there's no physics behind it
From: rick_s on 3 Jun 2010 14:15
In article <6BF5A76F-5DB5-449C-9C8A-AB46D27973AE%a(a)b.com>, a(a)b.com says...
>
>
>jimp(a)specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
>> In sci.physics Bret Cahill <BretCahill(a)peoplepc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Pressure sensors are good to five or 6 decimal places.
>>>
>>> Instead BP was off by several _orders of magnitude_.
>>>
>>> The excuse for that "error" or "omission" does not exist.
>>
>> Even if true, why should anyone be spending any effort whatsoever to
>> instrument the flow?
>>
>> The problem is that it IS flowing and the objective is to STOP it as soon
>> as possible, not do science experiments.
>
>Do ya suppose that the flow rate might have something to do with engineering
>the proper solution for stopping (or even STOPPING) the leak, genius?
>>
>> I suppose if your house catches fire you are going to be running around
>> installing sensors to quantify the fire instead of working on putting it
>> out?
>
>Do ya suppose that the leak might be nothing like a fire at your house,
>genius?
>
>


Can you say manufactured excuse to raise oil prices?

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Assumption of length contraction in original theory
Next: Dark Energy: The problem with Einstein's Cosmological Constant is that there's no physics behind it