From: Chris on 16 Nov 2009 06:01 alexd wrote: > Meanwhile, at the uk.comp.os.linux Job Justification Hearings, > Chris chose the tried and tested strategy of: > >> If you're paying £30pm then yes, it's stingy, but at £15pm, I >> think not. If you want more, you pay more. > > For £17.50 he could have Be with no limits. Assuming he has Be at his local exchange, which is more than likely not to be the case. -- The email address is a spam trap. I rarely use it.
From: Owain on 16 Nov 2009 06:18 On 13 Nov, 11:42, "Dave Liquorice" wrote: > Last month my lad "discovered" YouTube, download consumption has shot > up from 6 or 7GB/month previously to around 15GB/month. And that's > crappy YouTube stuff not iPlayer. Wait till he "discovers" xtube ... Owain
From: Darren Salt on 16 Nov 2009 08:24 I demand that Chris Davies may or may not have written... [snip] > Mind you, an hour of HD weighs in at around (IIRC) 1.5 GB and for one-off > watching I simply can't be bothered with the effort (or the bandwidth). An hour's worth of BBC1 (as broadcast) takes up about 1.4GB these days. -- | Darren Salt | linux at youmustbejoking | nr. Ashington, | Doon | using Debian GNU/Linux | or ds ,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | Army | + http://www.youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk/ Pull yourself together; things are not all that bad.
From: Chris Davies on 17 Nov 2009 16:31 Darren Salt <news(a)youmustbejoking.demon.cu.invalid> wrote: > I demand that Chris Davies may or may not have written... >> Mind you, an hour of HD weighs in at around (IIRC) 1.5 GB and for one-off >> watching I simply can't be bothered with the effort (or the bandwidth). > An hour's worth of BBC1 (as broadcast) takes up about 1.4GB these days. Maybe it does, and since I don't bother worrying about broadcast capture I won't argue. But what I would strongly recommend is that you take a look at the quality/diskspace tradeoff provided via a decent quality H.264 download from iPlayer. If you want to contact me offlist I'll happily provide a short segment from something I downloaded in the past seven days. Chris
From: Andy Furniss on 18 Nov 2009 16:32 rich wrote: > On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:33:42 +0000, Andy Furniss wrote: > FWIW as a comparison I downloaded the same 8 minute-ish youtube using > both clive and youtube-dl with odd results. Strange - I don't often use it or youtube. I did notice that some youtube vids now display larger in browser but if you hit the hq button you get a smaller version. I also, using -b on an old youtube-dl have got smaller versions than browser. Using latest youtube-dl I tried an xfactor clip which does this (in browser) today and -b does now get the big version, without the -b gave much lower quality, it would be handy if like get_iplayer you could list all the available files, but I couldn't see a way. Details from mplayer. The quality on the -b wasn't that bad - VIDEO: [H264] 854x480 0bpp 25.000 fps 1229.7 kbps (150.1 kbyte/s) Clip info: duration: 386 starttime: 0 totalduration: 386 width: 854 height: 480 videodatarate: 1201 audiodatarate: 96 totaldatarate: 1303 framerate: 25 bytelength: 62978910 I guess without -b you get the lowest - VIDEO: [FLV1] 400x226 0bpp 25.000 fps 266.6 kbps (32.5 kbyte/s) Clip info: duration: 386 starttime: 0 totalduration: 386 width: 400 height: 226 videodatarate: 260 audiodatarate: 33 totaldatarate: 301 framerate: 25 bytelength: 14530276
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Prev: chainloading Grub2 problem? Next: Fedora 11 Acer Aspire 1 boot problem |