Books
in [Live Sound]
|
From: Gareth Magennis on 3 Feb 2006 08:44 >> >> I just lean more towards the distinct possibility that we don't know all >> there is to know yet and what we do know may well be shown to be wrong at >> some point. History has a habit of showing this to be the trend. >> >> Quantum Mechanics really is a fascinating subject, and this DVD has an >> entertaining and interesting coverage of this and related subjects. It >> seems to have been put together by believers in some sort of "God" which >> is why I though Arny may have been interested - my posting was aimed more >> at him than you. >> >> >> >> Gareth. > > I honestly believe that when the answers are all on the table we will find > out "god" is one of the major forces, I think it is magnetizm(which also > encompasses electricity/chemical bonding and such), but it could be > gravity > george >> >> > > I tend not to like the idea of "these are the facts" so I don't follow any kind of religion at all. If I had to choose I think Buddism would be closest to being comfortable with. (even though it is not a religion) There is a lot of smart out-of-the-box thinking going on over that way. Gareth.
From: mcsteve on 3 Feb 2006 23:52 "Joey" wrote: > if I and the other 85% of Americans who consider > themselves Christians are wrong - > Well, right there, you're already wrong. From 1990, to 2001, the percentage of Americans who identify as "christians" dropped from 86%, to 77%. Since the newest figure I found is 5 years old, I'd guess the number is even lower, by now. One would at least *hope* so, for the good of the country. http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_prac2.htm ------------------------ Steve McQ "Could I have less stupid bible-thumper in my monitor, please?"
From: Joseph Ashwood on 4 Feb 2006 01:40 "Judge not, that ye be not judged." KJV Matt 7:1, original KJV text "Judge not lest ye be judged" Might I suggest, that before debating the merits of your particular variation of Christianity you read the only common distribution of a direct translation, the King James Version, preferably the original and examine for yourself exactly how Christian you truly are. Joe
From: Joe Kotroczo on 4 Feb 2006 05:45 On 02/02/06 08:00, in article 43e1ae11$1(a)clear.net.nz, "shannon" <me2(a)privacy.net> wrote: (...) > It helps if you have an interest in physics as well as music and will go > out of your way to find out why meters that are calibrated to our > systems of perception are logarithmic and what the Weber Fechner law is, > and how Helmholtz resonators work, and what mechanical and electrical > equivalent circuits are. What Lenz's law is and what happened when > Augustin Fresnels ideas on optics were applied to acoustics. Speaking of Helmholtz, his " On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music" makes a very interesting read. Probably the first to combine the physics AND the psychology of hearing. -- Joe Kotroczo kotroczo(a)mac.com
From: Joe Kotroczo on 4 Feb 2006 05:48
On 02/02/06 12:37, in article thk3u19lbnr033ssonrqh742ct13ipfmuh(a)4ax.com, "Marc Amsterdam" <reply(a)newsgroup.only> wrote: (...) > the Audio system designer technical reference by Klark teknik > comes around very handy from time to time Is the Klark Teknik book still in print? Can't find any reference to it on their website... -- Joe Kotroczo kotroczo(a)mac.com |