Prev: Bottoms wonders what the web is
Next: Bottoms discerns lack of fine line between better
From: »Q« on 30 Jun 2010 21:58
In <news:Xns9DA72A6F2B2A7bearbottoms1gmaicom(a)news.albasani.net>,
Bear Bottoms <bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com> wrote:

> =?UTF-8?B?wrtRwqs=?= <boxcars(a)gmx.net> wrote in
> news:20100629191527.76e56afd(a)bellgrove.remarqs.net:
>
> > In <news:i0dm2o$r7r$1(a)speranza.aioe.org>,
> > Nemesis <somewhere(a)home.br> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:07:24 +0100, Martin Jay wrote:

> >> > Are Linux and Apache the same thing?
> >> No, but Apache is built for Linux and the windows version is
> >> a kick-off from that. Nobody in their right mind would set up
> >> Apache on a Window$ servers, if the free Linux version is more
> >> stable. Except Balmer and Bare Bottoms, I suppose.
> >> []'s
> >>
> >> PS You dont even need a gui for Apache. Or PHP or Mysql ...
> >
> > Apache's first target was UNIX, not specifically GNU/Linux. I'm
> > sure you and others are right when you say not many people are
> > running Apache servers on Windows, but neither is it measure of
> > GNU/Linux share.
> >
> > Bottoms does use Apache; I dunno about Ballmer.
>
> Did you get that information without the Internet?

Some of it. Which parts were you worried about?
From: »Q« on 4 Jul 2010 17:22
In <news:Xns9DA831282BBF8bearbottoms1gmaicom(a)news.albasani.net>,
Bear Bottoms <bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com> wrote:

> =?UTF-8?B?wrtRwqs=?= <boxcars(a)gmx.net> wrote in
> news:20100630205814.7b8dd5ee(a)bellgrove.remarqs.net:

> >> > Apache's first target was UNIX, not specifically GNU/Linux. I'm
> >> > sure you and others are right when you say not many people are
> >> > running Apache servers on Windows, but neither is it measure of
> >> > GNU/Linux share.
> >> >
> >> > Bottoms does use Apache; I dunno about Ballmer.
> >>
> >> Did you get that information without the Internet?
> >
> > Some of it. Which parts were you worried about?
>
> Liar.

Did you get that information without using your head?
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Bottoms wonders what the web is
Next: Bottoms discerns lack of fine line between better