Prev: A Measurement of CO2 Climate Forcing, and an estimation of it's increase.
Next: 'Relativistic' "Doppler" shift
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 1 Aug 2010 18:07
Last time I wrote on Brain Locus theory was apparently this:
sci.physics, sci.med, sci.bio.misc
2010, Jan 8, 1:43 am
Subj: PBS's "This Emotional Life" ECT; Brain Locus theory #26 Brain as
Radio Receiver
Fm: plutonium.archimedes(a)gmail.com

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> As I said previously, I always go into these new adventures of
> discovery with a gloomy
> prospect of success, but I seem to always emerge with some sort of
> victory.
>
> To make mathematics precise and well-defined of finite-number versus
> infinite-number, needs
> only one small fantastic trick. Set down a boundary line where above
> is infinity and below is
> finite. Here we use Physics to set that boundary, because where
> Physics ends, so does numbers and mathematics comes to an end. The
> largest meaningful number in Physics is the Planck Unit where there no
> longer is a Strong Nuclear Force to exist, and this is at nucleons
> of 253, or 253! = 10^500. This is around element 100. There!! Well
> done to make a well-defined, precision definition of finite number
> versus infinite number.
>
> Now what have I gotten into with a new adventure of trying to
> precision, well-define Life versus
> Nonlife? Admittedly a much tougher and harder thing to make precise.
> However, there is a feature of the Atom Totality theory that places a
> very sharp difference between what is living and what is nonliving. It
> comes from the John Bell Inequality with the Experiments that proved
> this inequality to be true, in other words, the Universe is run by
> quantum mechanics, both for the small microworld or the largest of
> macroworld. In order for the Cosmos to be having a Bell Inequality,
> means the Cosmos must have a "control center" so that when signal A
> clear across the Cosmos from signal B is changed causing A to change
> instantly, needs a Cosmic control center, which is the Nucleus of the
> Atom Totality. John Bell called this concept "superdeterminism".
>
> To make a long story short.
>
> To precision define Life from NonLife when the Cosmos is an Atom
> Totality with a nucleus as
> control center, then all life must act as to how the Nucleus forces
> that plant or animal to act.
> This is done by shooting photons or neutrinos into the brain of a
> plant or animal, called the Brain Locus, which may consist of a single
> atom. The shot photon then is received by the Brain Locus much like a
> radio receives a signal from a broadcaster. The photon then tells the
> living organism what actions are to be carried out.
>
> So here we have a precision definition of what is Living and
> Nonliving. A living entity has a brain locus receiving signals from
> the Nucleus of the Atom Totality. A nonliving entity such as
> a rock or cup of water just follows the laws and theories of physics
> and has no brain locus of
> incoming signals. A brain locus is the mind of an organism and all
> living creatures from viruses
> to trees to animals have a brain locus and thus a mind.
>
> The brain locus is probably a single atom surrounded by other atoms
> but the single atom is the
> radio antennae of the mind and processes the shot photon or neutrino.
>
> It is the reason that all animals need to sleep, as sleep is a
> refocusing of the brain locus atom. Just like a radio needs to be
> "tuned". So sleep is another word for "tuning the mind".
>
> So that rocks and water and air have no need for a brain locus since
> the natural laws of physics will superdetermine their position and
> momentum at any given time. But as for
> living creatures, to have them superdetermined, requires absolute
> control over every thought
> and action and response by the Atom Totality, and that is achieved via
> a Brain Locus.
>
> So the precision definition of Life or Living versus NonLife or
> Nonliving, is that all life
> has a brain-locus. All Nonliving things have no brain locus.
>
> That is a very precise and well defined definition of what it means to
> be living. It means, the
> organism is in direct control by the Nucleus of an Atom Totality.
>
> How about a tree seed? Is that living? Well it must have a brain-locus
> to be living. Now if I cut
> off a piece of my skin, it is alive but it has no brain locus and will
> quickly become "dead matter". And a tree seed; is it like the cutoff
> piece of skin or is it like an organism that has a brain and thus a
> brain locus? Well, actually a seed like a virus needs alot of
> instructions at all times. So a seed as well as a virus contain a
> brain locus already in place, and receiving instructions from the
> Nucleus of the Atom Totality such as when to germinate, or for the
> virus, when to move one of its viral-appendages.
>
> Now some may wonder how a tree thinks with its brain locus? And that
> is a good question, but
> keep in mind that a tree has to come to many decisions as to when to
> start dropping leaves or
> mount a counterresponse on fungus or insect pests.
>
> So here I have found some success in a narrow well defined, precision
> definition. Life, all life
> has a brain locus, a radio receiver from instructions from the Nucleus
> of the Atom Totality.
>
> Now this would mean that the Atom Totality is a hierarchy above that
> of living versus nonliving.
> The Atom Totality is above life for it makes life possible.
>
> In the next posts, let me compare the precision of finite versus
> infinite as 10^500 with the idea that the precision of life versus
> nonlife is a brain-locus. I do not know if there is any comparison to
> make, other than both are sharp definitions. And let me drop the
> newsgroup sci.fractals since it is no longer relevant.
>

Not much comparison between finite number versus infinite number to
that
of Living versus Nonliving in terms of precision defining. One is a
boundary line,
whereas the biology is a added feature of a closed entity which
possess a brain
locus. So there is not much of a comparison, since one is a boundary
line and the
other is a added feature.

Now I defer to what a biological Radio receiver may look like in terms
of a few atoms
or molecules to compose a radio receiver. Is it a hexagonal shaped
molecule? Does lithium
have something to do with a Brain Locus for humans since it is a
mental illness treatment?
When schizophrenics hear voices, is it because the brain locus has
become interrupted, sort
of like a radio station interference with another station.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: A Measurement of CO2 Climate Forcing, and an estimation of it's increase.
Next: 'Relativistic' "Doppler" shift