Prev: [HACKERS] Branch created, let the experiment begin ...
Next: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp HEAD as 9.1devel.
From: Robert Haas on 9 Jul 2010 00:08 On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Marc G. Fournier <scrappy(a)postgresql.org> wrote: > > As decided at this years hackers conference, we are branching REL9_0_STABLE > *before* the release, instead of after. > > The hope is that we won't be taking away resources from finishing the > release, but still allow ppl to continue to work on projects that are for > 9.1. > > The branch is now created. Before we begin this experiment, we need to stamp HEAD as 9.1devel. As of this writing, it is still stamped as 9.0beta3. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Tom Lane on 9 Jul 2010 00:16 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(a)gmail.com> writes: > Before we begin this experiment, we need to stamp HEAD as 9.1devel. Done. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: "Joshua D. Drake" on 14 Jul 2010 13:25 On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 00:58 -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > As decided at this years hackers conference, we are branching > REL9_0_STABLE *before* the release, instead of after. > > The hope is that we won't be taking away resources from finishing the > release, but still allow ppl to continue to work on projects that are for > 9.1. > > The branch is now created. Is Git now the authoritative source? JD > > > -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Robert Haas on 14 Jul 2010 13:37 On Jul 14, 2010, at 12:25 PM, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(a)commandprompt.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 00:58 -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> As decided at this years hackers conference, we are branching >> REL9_0_STABLE *before* the release, instead of after. >> >> The hope is that we won't be taking away resources from finishing the >> release, but still allow ppl to continue to work on projects that are for >> 9.1. >> >> The branch is now created. > > Is Git now the authoritative source? >> No. Marc created the branch in CVS. ....Robert
From: Stephen Frost on 14 Jul 2010 13:42
* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(a)gmail.com) wrote: > On Jul 14, 2010, at 12:25 PM, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(a)commandprompt.com> wrote: > >> The branch is now created. > > > > Is Git now the authoritative source? > >> > > No. Marc created the branch in CVS. Right, the decision at the dev meeting (which could be OBE, so don't take this as gospel) was that we would switch to git after the first CF (basically, late August time-frame). Thanks, Stephen |