Prev: fs: make sure to invalidate pages if we fall back on buffered reads
Next: sequence lock in Linux
From: Ed Tomlinson on 14 Jun 2010 15:30 On Friday 11 June 2010 15:37:31 Chris Mason wrote: > Hello everyone, > > The master branch of the btrfs-unstable tree is a collection of fixes > and cleanups, including two btrfs regressions from rc1: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-unstable.git master > > One is an freeing blocks on an FS converted from ext34 to btrfs, > and the other is a fallocate fix. > > The rest are the usual small bug fixes. Looks like this still misses any fix for the oops I reported May 8th in thread: "[OPPS] btrfs on 33-3 with latest from btrfs-unstable.git master" Any chance this could be looked into? I've kept the fs just in case. Thanks Ed Tomlinson > > Dan Carpenter (11) commits (+24/-17): > Btrfs: handle error returns from btrfs_lookup_dir_item() (+2/-0) > Btrfs: btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name() returns ERR_PTRs (+4/-0) > Btrfs: unwind after btrfs_start_transaction() errors (+1/-1) > Btrfs: remove unneeded null check in btrfs_rename() (+1/-3) > Btrfs: The file argument for fsync() is never null (+1/-1) > Btrfs: handle ERR_PTR from posix_acl_from_xattr() (+2/-0) > Btrfs: btrfs_lookup_dir_item() can return ERR_PTR (+1/-1) > Btrfs: uninitialized data is check_path_shared() (+1/-1) > Btrfs: handle kzalloc() failure in open_ctree() (+5/-2) > Btrfs: silence sparse warnings in ioctl.c (+4/-6) > Btrfs: btrfs_iget() returns ERR_PTR (+2/-2) > > Zheng Yan (2) commits (+6/-4): > Btrfs: Fix BUG_ON for fs converted from extN (+2/-1) > Btrfs: Fix null dereference in relocation.c (+4/-3) > > Liu Bo (2) commits (+14/-4): > Btrfs: Add error check for add_to_page_cache_lru (+13/-3) > Btrfs: fix break in btrfs_insert_some_items() (+1/-1) > > Julia Lawall (2) commits (+9/-17): > Btrfs: Use memdup_user (+6/-14) > Btrfs: Use ERR_CAST (+3/-3) > > Shi Weihua (2) commits (+6/-0): > Btrfs: prohibit a operation of changing acl's mask when noacl mount option used (+3/-0) > Btrfs: should add a permission check for setfacl (+3/-0) > > Miao Xie (2) commits (+9/-1): > Btrfs: fix loop device on top of btrfs (+1/-0) > Btrfs: fix remap_file_pages error (+8/-1) > > Sage Weil (1) commits (+0/-3): > Btrfs: avoid BUG when dropping root and reference in same transaction > > Andi Kleen (1) commits (+2/-94): > BTRFS: Clean up unused variables -- nonbugs > > Josef Bacik (1) commits (+1/-1): > Btrfs: fix fallocate regression > > Prarit Bhargava (1) commits (+1/-1): > Btrfs: Fix warning in tree_search() > > Total: (25) commits (+72/-142) > > fs/btrfs/acl.c | 8 ++++++++ > fs/btrfs/compression.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- > fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 20 +------------------- > fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 22 +++++++++------------- > fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 5 ++--- > fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 9 --------- > fs/btrfs/extent_map.c | 4 ++-- > fs/btrfs/file.c | 12 ++++++++++-- > fs/btrfs/inode.c | 22 +++------------------- > fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 36 ++++++++++++------------------------ > fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c | 4 +--- > fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 7 ++++--- > fs/btrfs/root-tree.c | 5 ----- > fs/btrfs/super.c | 14 +++++++------- > fs/btrfs/tree-defrag.c | 2 -- > fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 15 --------------- > fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 4 ---- > fs/btrfs/xattr.c | 2 -- > fs/btrfs/zlib.c | 5 ----- > 19 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-) > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Chris Mason on 14 Jun 2010 20:50 On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 03:24:19PM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > On Friday 11 June 2010 15:37:31 Chris Mason wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > The master branch of the btrfs-unstable tree is a collection of fixes > > and cleanups, including two btrfs regressions from rc1: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-unstable.git master > > > > One is an freeing blocks on an FS converted from ext34 to btrfs, > > and the other is a fallocate fix. > > > > The rest are the usual small bug fixes. > > Looks like this still misses any fix for the oops I reported May 8th in thread: > "[OPPS] btrfs on 33-3 with latest from btrfs-unstable.git master" > > Any chance this could be looked into? I've kept the fs just in case. The oops shows a crc failure and then we were not able to read the tree block. Yan Zheng is working on an fsck that can repair things now. Until then the best I can do is help copy things off. Would you rather save the FS to test fsck? -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Ed Tomlinson on 15 Jun 2010 07:20 On Monday 14 June 2010 20:47:35 Chris Mason wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 03:24:19PM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > On Friday 11 June 2010 15:37:31 Chris Mason wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > The master branch of the btrfs-unstable tree is a collection of fixes > > > and cleanups, including two btrfs regressions from rc1: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-unstable.git master > > > > > > One is an freeing blocks on an FS converted from ext34 to btrfs, > > > and the other is a fallocate fix. > > > > > > The rest are the usual small bug fixes. > > > > Looks like this still misses any fix for the oops I reported May 8th in thread: > > "[OPPS] btrfs on 33-3 with latest from btrfs-unstable.git master" > > > > Any chance this could be looked into? I've kept the fs just in case. > > The oops shows a crc failure and then we were not able to read the tree > block. Yan Zheng is working on an fsck that can repair things now. > Until then the best I can do is help copy things off. > > Would you rather save the FS to test fsck? I can hang on to the FS for a while longer. One interesting point. The FS has both both meta-data and data mirroring enabled. I gather the oops is implying that both versions are corrupt. Btw the fs problem occured after heavy vm activity caused by running too many kvm(s). Thanks Ed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: fs: make sure to invalidate pages if we fall back on buffered reads Next: sequence lock in Linux |