Prev: What is 1080p (about screen resolution)?
Next: WTB: Microsoft, Corel, Adobe, Macromedia, Symantec, Veritas and others software - WE PAY CASH!
From: Daddy on 29 May 2010 21:21 Christopher Muto wrote: > Ron Hardin wrote: >> Recording Limbaugh today, two Inspirons (a 1200 and a 2200) running >> real producer (real audio's free encoders of audio) both went beserk, >> taking 100% of the CPU at highest priority. >> >> Very strange. It's been working perfectly unattended for many years, >> recording and saving noon-3pm in nicely dated files M-F every week. >> >> What's different about today (Friday?) >> >> One thing is that the last 25 bits of the "unix" time, and hence XP >> time, rolled over to zero. >> >> It's very likely that real producer uses a 24 bit local time. >> >> The rollover happened at 17:40:16 GMT, to the minute the same as the >> encoding time locked up in the one visible window. > > it is streamed in flash and windows media player format too. didn't > know that anyone still used real player. Just my opinion, but Real Player could have been a champion, as could have been Rhapsody...instead Real shot themselves in the foot with a player that had a huge footprint and trampled on users privacy. Daddy
From: William R. Walsh on 2 Jun 2010 01:24 Thank you for saying that! ;-) William
From: William R. Walsh on 2 Jun 2010 01:30 Hi! > Recording Limbaugh today Did you consider the source material? (cue instant rimshot) -- sorry, couldn't resist. ;-) In all seriousness, every account I ever heard of someone using Realproducer suggested that it just wasn't very good software... Of course, most of those were running on some Linux distribution. If it's worked for you, and the regular suspects (driver updates, software updates, Windows updates, etc) seem to check out, I wonder if there was some anomaly in the source material that represented an "impossible problem" for the encoder to handle and it just flew into a loop trying to make some sense of it. Is the source something like a radio tuner? Could it have been some experiment in copy protection? William
From: Ron Hardin on 7 Jun 2010 09:25
William R. Walsh wrote: > > Hi! > > > Recording Limbaugh today > > Did you consider the source material? (cue instant rimshot) -- sorry, > couldn't resist. > > ;-) > > In all seriousness, every account I ever heard of someone using Realproducer > suggested that it just wasn't very good software... Of course, most of those > were running on some Linux distribution. > > If it's worked for you, and the regular suspects (driver updates, software > updates, Windows updates, etc) seem to check out, I wonder if there was some > anomaly in the source material that represented an "impossible problem" for > the encoder to handle and it just flew into a loop trying to make some sense > of it. Is the source something like a radio tuner? Could it have been some > experiment in copy protection? > > William That it happened at the same time on two machines, one encoding 8.5kb and the other 11.5kbs, at the exact time (to the minute) that the 32-bit one-second time rolled over its last 25 bits, suggests it has to be a simple bug. One machine put out a diaganostic from the encoder that the system load was high and it was dropping to a target rate of 000, which I put down retrospectively to a division that didn't work, suggesting the bit rollover gets into the computation somehow. Say they simply use less than the full 32 bits of the time. The other machine doubtless put out the same thing but I couldn't get it to unblank the screen. Real encoder was taking 100% of the cpu at some insanely high priority. I use real audio because the low quality 8.5kbs audio is pretty good and takes less than 4mb/hr (6mb/hr for low quality but decent music at 11.5kbs); and for historical reasons now, since I started saving real-encoded radio programs in '98. -- rhhardin(a)mindspring.com On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk. |