From: Rune Allnor on
On 23 Feb, 16:03, "Steven Lord" <sl...(a)mathworks.com> wrote:
> "enviro" <farhadnejadkoo...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>
> news:1088818060.255196.1266935417071.JavaMail.root(a)gallium.mathforum.org...
>
> > Hi there
> > Do you have an idea how to fix a problem with "datevec". there seems to be
> > a problem at 24 O'clock. For instance please try below example. Please
> > note this is in the middle of a code with massive data so I cant change it
> > manually.
>
> > [year, month, day,hour] =datevec('2008/03/31 24:00:00','yyyy/mm/dd
> > HH:MM:SS')
>
> This is not a bug.

Eh... it might be not be a bug in the sense that the
behaviour is intended, but it *is* a bug in the sense
that the behaviour is ambiguous. From the everyday
language point of view the time '24:00' might make some
sense, but once you get into the details, it does no longer.

I think it might be wise to guard agains the 24:00 time,
and instead go for 00:00 at the next day.

Rune
From: TideMan on
On Feb 24, 10:24 am, Rune Allnor <all...(a)tele.ntnu.no> wrote:
> On 23 Feb, 16:03, "Steven Lord" <sl...(a)mathworks.com> wrote:
>
> > "enviro" <farhadnejadkoo...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>
> >news:1088818060.255196.1266935417071.JavaMail.root(a)gallium.mathforum.org....
>
> > > Hi there
> > > Do you have an idea how to fix a problem with "datevec". there seems to be
> > > a problem at 24 O'clock. For instance please try below example. Please
> > > note this is in the middle of a code with massive data so I cant change it
> > > manually.
>
> > > [year, month, day,hour] =datevec('2008/03/31 24:00:00','yyyy/mm/dd
> > > HH:MM:SS')
>
> > This is not a bug.
>
> Eh... it might be not be a bug in the sense that the
> behaviour is intended, but it *is* a bug in the sense
> that the behaviour is ambiguous. From the everyday
> language point of view the time '24:00' might make some
> sense, but once you get into the details, it does no longer.
>
> I think it might be wise to guard agains the 24:00 time,
> and instead go for 00:00 at the next day.
>
> Rune

But, Rune, that's what Matlab does do.
It converts 24:00:00 to 00:00:00 next day.
The OP was complaining that it did this instead of retaining 24:00:00.

I have some other software that uses 240000 instead of 0 and it's
infuriating when moving from times (in this case seconds since 1-
Jan-1940) back to yyyymmdd HHMMSS format, especially since it uses
integer arithmetic for the times.

So, IMHO, this is not a Matlab bug, but an excellent feature.

From: Jan Simon on
Dear TideMan!

> It converts 24:00:00 to 00:00:00 next day.
> So, IMHO, this is not a Matlab bug, but an excellent feature.

And it is exactly what my alarm-clock does.
Does anybody knows a clock which displays 24:00:00 or even 24:00:01 ?!
And if you find such a clock, does this time mean, that it is tomorrow, today or yesterday?

Kind regards, Jan
From: Walter Roberson on
Jan Simon wrote:

>> Question: does datevec take into account leap seconds? The most recent
>> of those was 2008/12/31 24:00:00 which was -not- the same time as
>> 2009/01/01 00:00:00 .

I should have said 2008/12/31 23:59:60 as the time of the leap second. But the
result would have been the same:

> Inspected the source: No leap seconds in DATEVEC.
> No support of daylight saving time tricks also.
From: XYZ on
On 2010-02-24 00:40, Walter Roberson wrote:
> Jan Simon wrote:
>
>>> Question: does datevec take into account leap seconds? The most
>>> recent of those was 2008/12/31 24:00:00 which was -not- the same time
>>> as 2009/01/01 00:00:00 .
>
> I should have said 2008/12/31 23:59:60 as the time of the leap second.
> But the result would have been the same:
>
>> Inspected the source: No leap seconds in DATEVEC.
>> No support of daylight saving time tricks also.
Did anyone hear of an improved version that would include the above,
incl. support for 1-24 hour format?

Best,
Rob
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Inf
Next: access data from whole cell array