From: -jg on 9 Jun 2010 18:41 On Jun 10, 4:44 am, D Yuniskis > Had you seen the *original* PICs (General Instruments) *and* > compared them to what was available from other vendors at > the time, you would have found it amusing: > "Is this a joke? You know, one of those April Fool's Day > bogus advertisements?" > (I had a similar reaction when Motogorilla later introduced > their *one* bit "ICU") Does anyone know someone who actually _used_ that one-bit ICU ? [MC14500B] I remember doing a CPLD version, as a teaching exercise. I see there is even an opencores page (no code yet) http://opencores.org/project,icu -jg
From: D Yuniskis on 9 Jun 2010 19:55 Hi Jim, -jg wrote: > On Jun 10, 4:44 am, D Yuniskis > Had you seen the *original* PICs > (General Instruments) *and* >> compared them to what was available from other vendors at >> the time, you would have found it amusing: >> "Is this a joke? You know, one of those April Fool's Day >> bogus advertisements?" >> (I had a similar reaction when Motogorilla later introduced >> their *one* bit "ICU") > > Does anyone know someone who actually _used_ that one-bit ICU ? > [MC14500B] Dunno. I recall the small *red* pamphlet. Looked like someone had invested *just* enough effort to make a good April Fool's Joke out of the thing (like Signetics' WOM... I particularly liked the 2% tolerance on Vdd :> ) (sigh) No more clever hackers. :< > I remember doing a CPLD version, as a teaching exercise. > > I see there is even an opencores page (no code yet) > http://opencores.org/project,icu
From: Joe Chisolm on 9 Jun 2010 20:19 On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 07:37:07 -0600, hamilton wrote: > On 6/9/2010 12:51 AM, Meindert Sprang wrote: >> "Grant Edwards"<invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote in message >> news:huljbj$aft$2(a)reader1.panix.com... >>> In my experience, "yuck!" is what anybody trying to use C on a PIC >>> ought to expect. [IMO, "yuck!" is what you get using asm on a PIC as >>> well, but that's probably a little more subjective.] >> >> "Yuck" is what you get when using a PIC at all..... Whoever designed >> this architecture should be crucified!! > > Yes, and they are laughing all the way to the bank. > > Not bad for a "Yuck" design. > > hamilton > > > >> Meindert >> >> Not bad indeed. 6 billion microcontrollers shipped. The latest financial report says they are close to 950K development systems. They shipped 45,000 this last quarter alone. Record revenues and dividend increased to 34.2c/share. Plus now I can order small qty parts pre-programmed. One time setup fee of $60 and something like 10 or 20 cents per part to program. Just like any other microcontroller the PIC series have a sweet spot for solving particular problems. If your requirements are to run a full blow RTOS or Linux then dont spec a PIC. Frankly I dont worry too much about the compiler. I can spend my time in better ways. If I'm so code size constrained that I'm worried about the compiler using 8 instructions instead of 4, or performance constrained that looping 16 times is a killer, then code the function in asm, spend the big bucks for a different compiler or choose a different microcontroller. Hell, the X86 architecture sucks but it aint going away any time soon. I've done several projects using a PIC. My current project wont be a PIC, the PIC is not a correct fit for the problem set. The next project on the horizon probably will be a PIC, different set of requirements. -- Joe Chisolm Marble Falls, Tx.
From: Walter Banks on 10 Jun 2010 06:55 -jg wrote: > Does anyone know someone who actually _used_ that one-bit ICU ? > [MC14500B] It was used as far as I know for essential one application area low speed switching and sequential applications. The only application I know for sure was traffic light control. At the time it was a low cost solution replacing mechanic timers and relay sequencers. Regards, w.. -- Walter Banks Byte Craft Limited http://www.bytecraft.com
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Prev: Which is the better method to use "if else" statements Next: need advice on device design |