CAD in creative design, problem solving
in [SolidWorks]
|
Prev: When Jon Banquer Asks The Beginner Questions With The First Letter Of Every Word Capitalized...
Next: import Revit data
From: Ed Huntress on 19 May 2010 17:34 "cavelamb" <cavelamb(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message news:zc6dnTvi7fXKzGnWnZ2dnUVZ_sKdnZ2d(a)earthlink.com... > > http://www.amazon.com/Structures-Things-Dont-Fall-Down/dp/0306812835/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1274302771&sr=1-1 Ha! I just re-read that book a few weeks ago. It's a good one. -- Ed Huntress
From: Joe788 on 19 May 2010 20:44 The bullshit goes on and on from worthless motherfuckers who can't back up what they have to say with FACTS. It is a FACT that with history based solid modeling you better be damn sure you have a good idea of what you want before you start modeling because it's next to impossible to radically change your mind without having to start all over from scratch. This limitation doesn't exist with direct modeling. History based modeling is an approx 25 year old dated concept popularized by PTC (Pro/E). It's time to move on to better CAD tools than history based solid modelers. Smarter CADCAM users are starting to do just that.
From: cncmillgil on 19 May 2010 21:05 On May 19, 11:17 am, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote: > On Tue, 18 May 2010 17:01:13 -0700 (PDT), cncmillgil <mil...(a)cin.net> wrote: > >Most all solid modelers are "napkin sketchers" > > Paint type programs are ok just to convey idea's but eventually it > >should go to a CAD system. So why not skip that time used in Paint > >Brush or Paint Shop Pro & go right to CAD modeling? > > What runs on the "designer"s" Apple? > -- > Cliff 2E , Lisa or Mac? Oh the IPad thats it! -- ~g~
From: Joe788 on 19 May 2010 21:28 On May 19, 5:44 pm, Joe788 <larryro...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > The bullshit goes on and on from worthless motherfuckers who can't > back up what they have to say with FACTS. > > It is a FACT that with history based solid modeling you better be damn > sure you have a good idea of what you want before you start modeling > because it's next to impossible to radically change your mind without > having to start all over from scratch. > > This limitation doesn't exist with direct modeling. > > History based modeling is an approx 25 year old dated concept > popularized by PTC (Pro/E). > > It's time to move on to better CAD tools than history based solid > modelers. Smarter CADCAM users are starting to do just that. Typical Banquer Babble from an imbecile who's entire "design" experience consists of watching Youtube videos and canned demos.
From: Joe788 on 19 May 2010 22:06
The bullshit goes on and on from worthless motherfuckers who can't back up what they have to say with FACTS. It is a FACT that with history based solid modeling you better be damn sure you have a good idea of what you want before you start modeling because it's next to impossible to radically change your mind without having to start all over from scratch. This limitation doesn't exist with direct modeling. History based modeling is an approx 25 year old dated concept popularized by PTC (Pro/E). It's time to move on to better CAD tools than history based solid modelers. Smarter CADCAM users are starting to do just that. |