Prev: SCI.MATH - "You thought Infinity was BIG? .... this is SOOOO BIG you can't count them!"
Next: Why Can You Negate a Decision but Not a Set & The Problems with {}
From: George Greene on 20 Jun 2010 15:32
On Jun 20, 1:50 pm, "|-|ercules" <radgray...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> Great anti-diagonal formula George, much better than (L(n,n)+1) mod 9
> You going to keep using it?  

OF COURSE I am going to keep using it!

> Or you going to admit you're a fool twice in one thread!!

There is nothing foolish about the formula.
What is foolish is you bothering to go Mod for something that
doesn't need anything THAT COMPLICATED and that suffers from
THE SAME defect in any case!

From: |-|ercules on 20 Jun 2010 15:38
"George Greene" <greeneg(a)email.unc.edu> wrote
> On Jun 20, 1:50 pm, "|-|ercules" <radgray...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Great anti-diagonal formula George, much better than (L(n,n)+1) mod 9
>> You going to keep using it?
>
> OF COURSE I am going to keep using it!
>
>> Or you going to admit you're a fool twice in one thread!!
>
> There is nothing foolish about the formula.
> What is foolish is you bothering to go Mod for something that
> doesn't need anything THAT COMPLICATED and that suffers from
> THE SAME defect in any case!
>

In modulo arithmetic minus is more complicated than mod.

I don't believe you corrected a formula because minus is simpler than mod,
totally absurd. What's next no multiply?

Herc
From: George Greene on 20 Jun 2010 20:41
On Jun 20, 3:38 pm, "|-|ercules" <radgray...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> I don't believe you corrected a formula because minus is simpler than mod,
> totally absurd.

No, really, IT ISN'T. SIMPLIFYING EVERYTHING AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE
really is IMPORTANT, because it's the only way to get the actual
issues
simplified enough for everybody to see what an idiot you are.
From: |-|ercules on 20 Jun 2010 21:41
"George Greene" <greeneg(a)email.unc.edu> wrote
> On Jun 20, 3:38 pm, "|-|ercules" <radgray...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I don't believe you corrected a formula because minus is simpler than mod,
>> totally absurd.
>
> No, really, IT ISN'T. SIMPLIFYING EVERYTHING AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE
> really is IMPORTANT, because it's the only way to get the actual
> issues
> simplified enough for everybody to see what an idiot you are.

What's the definition of an idiot?

Someone who spent 4 years studying logic who can't answer
how wide this set is.

3
31
314
...

Herc
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: SCI.MATH - "You thought Infinity was BIG? .... this is SOOOO BIG you can't count them!"
Next: Why Can You Negate a Decision but Not a Set & The Problems with {}