From: Alessandro Antonangeli on
Il Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:03:01 +0000, Geoff Schaller ha scritto:

> If this is true then please explain how DBAdmin30 works?
>
> I think you have a path setting somewhere that is upsetting all this.
>
> One way out is to deliberately load the DLLs.
>
Geoff, I do not know: I posted a 5 minutes sample. Just make it, then get
a DBF in a dir where the CATO* are not present, right click on it and
select open with the newly created exe and you will see.

If it is not a bug, than please tell me what is wrong in what I did


--
Ciao, Alessandro
From: Geoff Schaller on
Can you email me your sample aef.
Let us sing from the same song sheet.


"Alessandro Antonangeli" <alcati.r3m0v3th1s(a)alcati.com> wrote in message
news:hjm9ue$dth$1(a)speranza.aioe.org:

> Il Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:03:01 +0000, Geoff Schaller ha scritto:
>
>
> > If this is true then please explain how DBAdmin30 works?
> >
> > I think you have a path setting somewhere that is upsetting all this.
> >
> > One way out is to deliberately load the DLLs.
> >
>
> Geoff, I do not know: I posted a 5 minutes sample. Just make it, then get
> a DBF in a dir where the CATO* are not present, right click on it and
> select open with the newly created exe and you will see.
>
> If it is not a bug, than please tell me what is wrong in what I did
>
>
> --
> Ciao, Alessandro

From: Alessandro Antonangeli on
Il Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:30:39 +0000, Geoff Schaller ha scritto:

> Can you email me your sample aef.
> Let us sing from the same song sheet.

It's simple, just make a new MDI and put the code I posted Monday 17:47
in place of START function

--
Ciao, Alessandro
From: E®!k /!sser on
> This has nothing to do with SP3. When the CATO DLLs are not available
> then VO uses a DataListView in stead of a DataBrowser when in Browse
> mode. I think this was already so in VO 2.0.

The datalistview is introduced in VO 2.5

Erik



"Robert van der Hulst" <E-55525A53-3684-E(a)heliks.nl> schreef in bericht
news:1708590173.20100125182233(a)heliks.nl...
> Hi Alessandro,
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, at 16:47:27 [GMT +0000 (UTC)] (which was 17:47 where
> I live)
> you wrote about: 'CATO*.DLL problem'
>
>> I'm just telling all of you, hoping it is just an error of mine
>
>> If Robert is reading (as I hope), he will see and fix it
>
>> Anyway, why should I report for a bug (loosing my time) and pay for it to
>> be solved? Or they made bug fix free or they should pay bug hunters :-P
>
>> Still on SP2.
>

>
>
> --
> Robert van der Hulst
> AKA Mr. Data
> Vo2Jet & Vo2Ado Support
> VO & Vulcan.NET Development Team
> www.heliks.nl
>
From: Robert van der Hulst on
Hi Alessandro,
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, at 08:37:54 [GMT +0000 (UTC)] (which was 9:37 where I live)
you wrote about: 'CATO*.DLL problem'

> No it's the same: the only differnce they do not pay for bug fixed: just
> for improvement

You are not paying for bug fixes too. You are paying to keep the
product alive.


--
Robert van der Hulst
AKA Mr. Data
Vo2Jet & Vo2Ado Support
VO & Vulcan.NET Development Team
www.heliks.nl

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Prev: CDX numeric Seek (old problem?)
Next: CATO*.DLL BUG