CAppModule issues
in [Visual C]
|
Prev: Problem in subclassing of ProgMan->SHELLDLL_DefView->SysListView32
Next: ___tmainCRTStartup question
From: NickP on 7 Dec 2006 08:42 Hi there, I am currently recieving an assertion failure with my declaration of CAppModule (AFAIK). The assertion failure is... atlbase.h line 2699 Expression: _pAtlModule ==0 My understanding of this is you can only have one instance of this object being declared in an application? Is there a work around for this? I found the following URL (from a similar question), but it doesn't look too relevant... http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/wtl/message/3085 also I can't even find an atdafx.h header. Any ideas on this one? Many thanks in advance. Nick.
From: Igor Tandetnik on 7 Dec 2006 08:51 "NickP" <a(a)a.com> wrote in message news:Of9vNWgGHHA.2456(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl > I am currently recieving an assertion failure with my declaration > of CAppModule (AFAIK). Show your declaration of CAppModule. What compiler version are you using? > also I can't even find an atdafx.h header. It's a typo. The post meant stdafx.h -- With best wishes, Igor Tandetnik With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead. -- RFC 1925
From: NickP on 7 Dec 2006 09:05 Hi Igor, In stdafx.h extern CAppModule _Module; In main source file, CAppModule _Module; I'm using Visual Studio 2005. This is the only reference I can find to any modules in the application and this error has just come about after integrating some 3rd party code, which I do not have source control over. Many thanks. Nick. "Igor Tandetnik" <itandetnik(a)mvps.org> wrote in message news:e7wZGbgGHHA.2128(a)TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > "NickP" <a(a)a.com> wrote in message > news:Of9vNWgGHHA.2456(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl >> I am currently recieving an assertion failure with my declaration >> of CAppModule (AFAIK). > > Show your declaration of CAppModule. What compiler version are you using? > >> also I can't even find an atdafx.h header. > > It's a typo. The post meant stdafx.h > -- > With best wishes, > Igor Tandetnik > > With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not > necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to > land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly > overhead. -- RFC 1925 >
From: Igor Tandetnik on 7 Dec 2006 10:40 NickP <a(a)a.com> wrote: > In stdafx.h > > extern CAppModule _Module; > > In main source file, > > CAppModule _Module; > > I'm using Visual Studio 2005. > > This is the only reference I can find to any modules in the > application and this error has just come about after integrating some > 3rd party code, which I do not have source control over. The assert happens in CAtlModule constructor, right? There should indeed only be one CAtlModule instance in an application, and it appears this third party code already defines one (a rather bad idea for a library intended to be integrated with other people's code). I suggest you contact the authors of that code. -- With best wishes, Igor Tandetnik With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead. -- RFC 1925
From: NickP on 7 Dec 2006 12:44
Hi Ignor, Thank you, this is what I had dreaded. Many thanks for confirming this. Nick. "Igor Tandetnik" <itandetnik(a)mvps.org> wrote in message news:e%23OfPYhGHHA.3780(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > NickP <a(a)a.com> wrote: >> In stdafx.h >> >> extern CAppModule _Module; >> >> In main source file, >> >> CAppModule _Module; >> >> I'm using Visual Studio 2005. >> >> This is the only reference I can find to any modules in the >> application and this error has just come about after integrating some >> 3rd party code, which I do not have source control over. > > The assert happens in CAtlModule constructor, right? There should indeed > only be one CAtlModule instance in an application, and it appears this > third party code already defines one (a rather bad idea for a library > intended to be integrated with other people's code). I suggest you contact > the authors of that code. > -- > With best wishes, > Igor Tandetnik > > With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not > necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to > land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly > overhead. -- RFC 1925 > > |