From: Robert Coe on 10 Jan 2010 13:05 On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:35:38 -0800, John McWilliams <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> wrote: : Chris H wrote: : : > : > The problem is these days getting a mobile phone without a camera.... I : > still have a Nokia 6210 when I have to use a phone with no camera. : : Under what circumstances do you have to use a phone sans camera ? The U.S. Federal Government has numerous installations into which you're not allowed to bring a camera. If your cell phone has a camera in it, you have to leave it at the guard's desk. I had it happen to me once or twice while I was a Government contractor. Now I work for a city government that has none of that paranoia, and I bring my camera to work whenever I feel like it. And I carry two camera-equipped cell phones, one of them provided by my employer. Bob
From: Gary Edstrom on 10 Jan 2010 14:59 On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:41:03 -0800, John McWilliams <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> wrote: >What's the antecedent for "they"? >Compact cameras allow skilled folk to take excellent photos. >DSLRs allow even more excellenter (sic) results when properly used. I agree completely! If you are really serious about photography, why not have BOTH types of cameras? I do. I carry my P&S EVERYWHERE. It doesn't stand out like a sore thumb and takes outstanding pictures under daylight conditions. I can go into places I would never be allowed in if I had a DSLR slung over my shoulder. For example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:The_Americana_at_Brand.jpg This was opening day at the "Americana at Brand" here in Glendale. They were allowing people to shoot with their P&S cameras. But if you had a DSLR, you had to register at the press booth. I break out my DSLR when I am planning some serious photography. But I may STILL take some P&S pictures, even if I have my DSLR along. You don't have to choose one camera or the other. Choose the camera that is right for the job at hand! Gary
From: Willy Wonka on 11 Jan 2010 00:53 On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:19:27 +0000, Chris H <chris(a)phaedsys.org> wrote: > >However with time (next 10 years?) I think most P&S users will use a >camera phone, just like David Bailey, and not a P&S camera. As the P&S >requires a high turn over I think the low end and many mid range P&S >will go as they are surpassed by the camera-phone. Will never happen. You can't put a 28mm-560mm wide-aperture ultra-zoom lens on one while also providing a high-quality image. For some people that require dependable, adaptable, compact, and lightweight cameras that are not prone to all the myriad problems (dust, mirror and sensor condensation, poor cold weather performance, cost, weight, obnoxiously loud mirror-slap and image destroying jarring from that mechanical action, no high-speed flash sync, etc. etc.) inherent in the interchangeable-lens SLR design, a DSLR will never be able to provide what they need and require. Cry all you want. There's a large portion of people that find exceptional performance from super-zoom fixed-lens cameras that aren't dependent on last-century's mechanical contraptions and poorly implemented phase-contrast focusing errors. That's why super-zoom P&S cameras sell as well as they do. Today and tomorrow. Even more-so tomorrow, as people find out that images from these cameras are every bit as good if not better than those coming from DSLRs these days. The very same way that film buffs finally found out that digital cameras surpassed their cherished film media. You don't see the newsgroups overrun with film vs. digital wars today do you? Just as you won't see newsgroups overrun with P&S vs DSLR wars in the very near future. The DSLR dinosaur is going the way of the film dinosaur. Your DSLR 8x10 view-camera's days are most definitely numbered.
From: Chris H on 11 Jan 2010 03:22 In message <hics4c$oqm$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, John McWilliams <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> writes >Chris H wrote: > >> The problem is these days getting a mobile phone without a >>camera.... I >> still have a Nokia 6210 when I have to use a phone with no camera. > >Under what circumstances do you have to use a phone sans camera ? When visiting customers. Many do not permit cameras in their establishments. >While originally scoffing at cell phone cameras, I use mine several >times a week. It's especially useful for location shots in conjunction >with my old DSLRs: it captures the GPS info and embeds it in the >metadata. Exactly.... This is why the low end P&S are dying out. "Everyone" carries a phone and 99% of them have a camera that is as good as the basic P&S from 2 years a go. -- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
From: Chris H on 11 Jan 2010 03:25 In message <124kk556e9b5fqgnmhnr3ttolilq7vidss(a)4ax.com>, Robert Coe <bob(a)1776.COM> writes >On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:35:38 -0800, John McWilliams <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> wrote: >: Chris H wrote: >: >: > >: > The problem is these days getting a mobile phone without a camera.... I >: > still have a Nokia 6210 when I have to use a phone with no camera. >: >: Under what circumstances do you have to use a phone sans camera ? > >The U.S. Federal Government has numerous installations into which you're not >allowed to bring a camera. If your cell phone has a camera in it, you have to >leave it at the guard's desk. I had it happen to me once or twice while I was >a Government contractor. Not just government departments. Many Defence companies, a lot of the automotive companies (the R&D parts) a lot of the test houses, there are many places where you can not take a camera. >Now I work for a city government that has none of that paranoia, It's not paranoia just security. It is not required everywhere. In fact the majority of places don't mind at all >and I bring >my camera to work whenever I feel like it. And I carry two camera-equipped >cell phones, one of them provided by my employer. I always carry a camera too... except when visiting some customers. -- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: $12,000 versus $1000 Next: Downloading from a Nikon P5100? |