Prev: Emacs/SLIME indentation for CLSQL code?
Next: Draft paper submission deadline is extended: AIPR-10, Orlando, USA
From: "Antti "Andy" Ylikoski" on 18 Feb 2010 08:37 Antti "Andy" Ylikoski wrote: > D Herring wrote: >> On 02/12/2010 01:10 PM, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote: >>> Byung-Hee HWANG<bh(a)izb.knu.ac.kr> writes: >>> >>>> Byung-Hee HWANG<bh(a)izb.knu.ac.kr> writes: >>>> >>>>> For first user, give me information about commnon lisp tools. At >>>>> google, >>>>> most page go to CMUCL. But i also interested in GCL (GNU Common >>>>> Lisp). What is best choice? >>>> >>>> Ah.. and please review about SBCL which from CMUCL ;; >>> >>> Sorry for confused. After all, i settled down at CLISP (from GNU) ;; >>> Still i'm baby for Common Lisp, many many help me from now on ^^; >> >> Please read this review of the different options. >> http://common-lisp.net/~dlw/LispSurvey.html >> >> Clisp is good. If you are interested in CMUCL for speed, SBCL is >> another good option (it forked from CMUCL many years ago). GCL is not >> widely used today. >> >> My suggestion: stay with clisp until it causes a problem. By then, >> you should have learned enough to pick another implementation more >> suitable to your needs. The ansi standard and many portability >> libraries make it easy to switch. >> >> - Daniel > > See > > http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/ > http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/lispbox/ > > the information there is a little bit outdated: > > Clozure Common LISP has SLIME and works under Windows > Embeddable Common LISP is missing > many others are missing > > Antti Ylikoski > Helsinki, Finland, the EU IMHO the CLISP contains bugs.... Never came across one in the Clozure CCL. Andy
From: Zach Beane on 18 Feb 2010 08:41 "Antti \"Andy\" Ylikoski" <antti.ylikoski(a)hut.fi> writes: > IMHO the CLISP contains bugs.... Never came across one in the Clozure CCL. Bugs are not typically matters of opinion. What bug did you encounter with CLISP? Perhaps it can be eliminated in future versions. Zach
From: "Antti "Andy" Ylikoski" on 19 Feb 2010 08:55 Zach Beane wrote: > "Antti \"Andy\" Ylikoski" <antti.ylikoski(a)hut.fi> writes: > >> IMHO the CLISP contains bugs.... Never came across one in the Clozure CCL. > > Bugs are not typically matters of opinion. What bug did you encounter > with CLISP? Perhaps it can be eliminated in future versions. > > Zach Two times I have succeeded in crashing the CLISP, without any really informative error message. "CLISP.exe stopped working" or such was what I got. One bug which I can remember that I had a function such as (defun prove (goals depth mark continuation assertions) ..... ) and I had called it with (approximately) the argument list (prove '(append.....) 4 *trail* '(funcall ...) '(if () then ())) and as a result the program crashed because the argument "mark" was not given a value -- even though the global variable *trail* did have a value. (I discovered this with the debugger.) regards, Antti Ylikoski Helsinki, Finland, the EU PS. As one can guess, this program was a Prolog interpreter written in LISP. Idem
From: Pascal J. Bourguignon on 19 Feb 2010 09:51 "Antti \"Andy\" Ylikoski" <antti.ylikoski(a)hut.fi> writes: > Zach Beane wrote: >> "Antti \"Andy\" Ylikoski" <antti.ylikoski(a)hut.fi> writes: >> >>> IMHO the CLISP contains bugs.... Never came across one in the Clozure CCL. >> >> Bugs are not typically matters of opinion. What bug did you encounter >> with CLISP? Perhaps it can be eliminated in future versions. >> >> Zach > > Two times I have succeeded in crashing the CLISP, without any really > informative error message. "CLISP.exe stopped working" or such was > what I got. > > One bug which I can remember that I had a function such as > > (defun prove (goals depth mark continuation assertions) ..... ) > > and I had called it with (approximately) the argument list > > (prove '(append.....) 4 *trail* '(funcall ...) '(if () then ())) > > and as a result the program crashed because the argument "mark" was > not given a value -- even though the global variable *trail* did have > a value. (I discovered this with the debugger.) > > regards, Antti Ylikoski > Helsinki, Finland, the EU > > PS. As one can guess, this program was a Prolog interpreter written > in LISP. That's strange. Perhaps on MS-Windows this clisp.exe had not been compiled with all the nice libraries that are needed to get good handling of memory faults and stack overflows? This is not the kind of things clisp breaks on unix targets (approximately, it happens only with FFI). Perhaps you should give a complete and precise bug report on mailto:clisp-list(a)lists.sourceforge.net -- __Pascal Bourguignon__
From: "Antti "Andy" Ylikoski" on 20 Feb 2010 04:34 Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote: > "Antti \"Andy\" Ylikoski" <antti.ylikoski(a)hut.fi> writes: > >> Zach Beane wrote: >>> "Antti \"Andy\" Ylikoski" <antti.ylikoski(a)hut.fi> writes: >>> >>>> IMHO the CLISP contains bugs.... Never came across one in the Clozure CCL. >>> Bugs are not typically matters of opinion. What bug did you encounter >>> with CLISP? Perhaps it can be eliminated in future versions. >>> >>> Zach >> Two times I have succeeded in crashing the CLISP, without any really >> informative error message. "CLISP.exe stopped working" or such was >> what I got. >> >> One bug which I can remember that I had a function such as >> >> (defun prove (goals depth mark continuation assertions) ..... ) >> >> and I had called it with (approximately) the argument list >> >> (prove '(append.....) 4 *trail* '(funcall ...) '(if () then ())) >> >> and as a result the program crashed because the argument "mark" was >> not given a value -- even though the global variable *trail* did have >> a value. (I discovered this with the debugger.) >> >> regards, Antti Ylikoski >> Helsinki, Finland, the EU >> >> PS. As one can guess, this program was a Prolog interpreter written >> in LISP. > > That's strange. Perhaps on MS-Windows this clisp.exe had not been > compiled with all the nice libraries that are needed to get good > handling of memory faults and stack overflows? > > This is not the kind of things clisp breaks on unix targets > (approximately, it happens only with FFI). > > Perhaps you should give a complete and precise bug report on > mailto:clisp-list(a)lists.sourceforge.net > I'm not using the old MS-DOS. I'm running Microsoft Windows 7 in a laptop PC with an AMD dual-core processor running at 1.2 GHz, 3GB of RAM and 220 GB of hard disk. At this moment I'm using a local library's WLAN. regards, Antti J. Ylikoski Helsinki, Finland, the EU
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Emacs/SLIME indentation for CLSQL code? Next: Draft paper submission deadline is extended: AIPR-10, Orlando, USA |