COME SEE * HATES US * EPIC FAIL -- "thinks" his cite says PNAC "wanted the attack" when his own cite shows it said NO SUCH THING! Iarnrod WINS again
in [Physics]
|
Prev: 9-11 was, of course, an inside job.
Next: nutbag iamdyke Hates the US and cannot dispute that PNAC "wantedthe attack" because that is the reality - inside job proven
From: Iarnrod on 22 Jun 2010 08:13 On Jun 22, 6:00 am, * Hates US * wrote: > http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf > > Their own words. None of which are the words you use. Hint: PNAC *never* said it wanted an attack, kooker. You're lying. Your own cite proves you're lying. > Watch the bushworshipper writhe and spew fallacies rather than deal with reality. That makes you the bushworshipper, counter-disinfo shill, since I am the only one dealing with facts and logic. You say PNAC said it wanted the attack yet you cannot provide the cite. EPIC FAIL.
From: Iarnrod on 22 Jun 2010 08:15
On Jun 22, 6:00 am, * Hates US * flailed in impotent kooker rage: > The bushworshipper has been commanded to ignore public records. Yes, you have. The public record proves I am right and you are wrong. Hint: Marvin Bush was not a principal in the firm. Hint: Learn what a principal is. Hint: The firm did not provide security at the WTC. Not ever. You're a liar. |