Prev: Ascii art, Was: Algebra Question
Next: Heavy water Experiment; 160 ppm deuterium Re: Additive Creation; Dirac's new radioactivities Chapt 5 #170; ATOM TOTALITY
From: Inverse 19 mathematics on 16 Jun 2010 14:31
YES that great mathematician , a PHD from UW Madison Wisconsin,
Probably under recognized, astute Professor of Mathematics ,Edgar
Escultura's words about his honest understanding of Tan 19= 1:3 , and
that "Hope research has probably discovered a new number system and
geometric plan , and it remains to be determined if it is superior to
current mathematics". These words will be added for history on a
bronze monument next to the inverse 19, -1 tangent Monument, for the
future.(He does not endorse our mathematics because of his caution)


" To see the world in a grain of sand and to hold eternity in the
palm of one's hand "---- is understanding, This great mathematician
saw something , may be it is not superior to current math , may be it
is , but atleaset he saw and was not blind , nor a thief like some
Ivory professors we have met on our road to Damascus

Hope Research

LINK


http://hoperesearch.web.officelive.com/default.aspx


From: Fran�ois Grondin on 17 Jun 2010 09:22

"Inverse 19 mathematics" <hope9900(a)verizon.net> a �crit dans le message de
news: 65059caa-24d9-453f-bc82-fcd563508c93(a)k39g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> YES that great mathematician , a PHD from UW Madison Wisconsin,
> Probably under recognized, astute Professor of Mathematics ,Edgar
> Escultura's words about his honest understanding of Tan 19= 1:3 , and
> that "Hope research has probably discovered a new number system and
> geometric plan , and it remains to be determined if it is superior to
> current mathematics". These words will be added for history on a
> bronze monument next to the inverse 19, -1 tangent Monument, for the
> future.(He does not endorse our mathematics because of his caution)
>
>
> " To see the world in a grain of sand and to hold eternity in the
> palm of one's hand "---- is understanding, This great mathematician
> saw something , may be it is not superior to current math , may be it
> is , but atleaset he saw and was not blind , nor a thief like some
> Ivory professors we have met on our road to Damascus
>
> Hope Research
>
> LINK
>
>
> http://hoperesearch.web.officelive.com/default.aspx
>
>

I seriously don't understand you... You claim that you've found a new
"alogarithm" as you name it for prime number determination. Fine... You
publish a list of prime numbers without showing how you did it. Not fine...
Anyone can copy stuff from the Internet, put it on his own web page or post
it, and claim it as his discovery (we all know someone on sci.math in
particular...) You publish list of numbers formatted in a way that only you
can "understand", and you want us to believe that you're one of the greatest
mathematicians alive? You're seriously disconnected from the reality!

If you want to improve your credibility, you need to publish your
discoveries, not only the results because these are well known. Claiming
that you have the truth and that the other mathematicians don't is childish.
You want to talk to mathematicians : start talking mathematics! I'm
skeptical by nature when it's about math. Show what you've got, accept
people who will challenge your ideas. This is how science evolves.

Why do you think people here don't take you seriously? Because you're not
serious.

Francois


 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Ascii art, Was: Algebra Question
Next: Heavy water Experiment; 160 ppm deuterium Re: Additive Creation; Dirac's new radioactivities Chapt 5 #170; ATOM TOTALITY