Prev: ECPG FETCH readahead
Next: [HACKERS] TOAST issue on custom index access method
From: Robert Haas on 25 Jun 2010 09:15
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(a)sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(a)gmail.com> writes:
>> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(a)2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 11:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> It might be a good idea to add a sentence to the documentation, though,
>>>> just pointing out that these control client-side keepalive probes rather
>>>> than server-side.
>>>
>>> Yes please. I was confused; I think others will be also.
>
>> Do either of you have any thoughts about where would be the best place
>> to add such a sentence?
>
> In the hunk you added to libpq.sgml would be fine by me.

Well, the trick is that the hunk that I added is really four separate
sections, and adding a whole sentence to each one seems like overkill.
Here's an attempt at rewording the sections so that the information
is included in each parameter's description without taking up a whole
sentence.

Thoughts?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: ECPG FETCH readahead
Next: [HACKERS] TOAST issue on custom index access method