From: Bruce Momjian on 11 Jan 2010 20:18 Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Meskes <meskes(a)postgresql.org> writes: > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 03:41:10PM +0100, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > >> Hmm not sure I find that commit message really helpful - but is it > >> actually of any use to maintain a Changelog file specifically for > >> ECPG? > > > Makes it easier to see what's new in ecpg when doing a new > > release. But I guess we could get all this from the cvs log too. The > > file has been there for a long time. > > Well, I'm pretty sure that release notes are prepared off of the cvs log > entries. I've never looked at ecpg's Changelog when working on notes, > and I'd be prepared to bet that Bruce hasn't either. My advice is to > drop the Changelog file and be sure you describe changes appropriately > in the commit messages. Agreed. I was never aware of an ecpg changelog file. Let's remove it and Michael can make any clarifications to the major releases he wants. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
|
Pages: 1 Prev: dbt2-shell script problem Next: 8.5alpha3 bug in information_schema.table_privileges |