From: jmfbahciv on 14 Feb 2010 09:07 J. Clarke wrote: > Mike Jr wrote: >> What an absolutely horrible idea. Are we training scientist or >> sheep? Looking at data is what we want scientist to learn to do. >> >> Did anybody read the Jack Vance Sci-fi classic "The Last Castle"? >> >> http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/compsimul.htm > > The problem comes from a lack of understanding of the nature of science. > Educators treat it as a body of knowledge to be learned and not as a method > of acquiring new knowledge--they may mention the latter in passing but what > gets drilled into the students is that they have to know this body of > knowledge. > > I'm sure that a student can be made to understand the concept of the phases > of the moon using a computer simulation. The trouble is that he gets the > notion that it's something abstract where if he learns it by direct > observation then he recognizes that it's something that is happening in the > real physical world and not in the probably deranged mind of some > schoolteacher. another problem with your example is that the student gets 2-D burnt into his/her brain. The reason for the phases is 3-D. Extrapolating to 4-D and then n-D will become impossible and produce people like the ineducable ones who post here. Lots of the nuts can't think in any geometry other than Euclidean. /BAH
|
Pages: 1 Prev: LHC. Ivan, what is Phaeton? Next: "Dear citizens, be ready to near death." |