Prev: Give me ONE digit position of any real that isn't computable up to that digit position!
Next: refurbished Michelson Interferometer Experiment to prove no Doppler Effect exists on lightwaves Chapt 8 #130; ATOM TOTALITY
From: George Greene on 4 Jun 2010 23:57 On Jun 4, 8:12 pm, Rick Decker <rdec...(a)hamilton.edu> wrote: > Err, no, unless you're using a non-standard definition of > "uncountable." In fact, the set {1, 2, 3, ... } is > countable, in the agreed-upon definition of the term. Err, no; in case you hadn't noticed, Herc does NOT agree. Moreover, he is even explaining WHY he doesn't agree. |