From: ~misfit~ on
Somewhere on teh intarwebs kony wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:15:49 -0500, George(a)here.com wrote:
>> I have a friend who has a problem that seems to stem from a mismatch
>> between what his monitor wants and what his computer can provide. The
>> monitor wants 1680 x 1050, but the closest choices provided by his
>> AGP graphics card are 1600 x 1000 or 1920 x 1080. He sets it for the
>> lower number, but the computer changes that to 1920 x 1080. The
>> too-high resolution causes the image to jiggle. He then has to go to
>> Control Panel and set the resolution back a notch to 1600 x 1000.
>>
>> Beyond another graphics card, how else can he rid himself of this
>> annoyance?
[snip]
> However, it seems likely you have an LCD not CRT monitor
> since it has a resolution of 1680x1050.

<phew!>

I was reading this thread with ever-increasing incredulity. Unless it's a
regional thing I've never known of wide-screen CRT monitors. In fact I
thought that the OP might well be some sort of trolling.
--
Shaun.

"Give a man a fire and he's warm for the day. But set fire to him and he's
warm for the rest of his life." Terry Pratchet, 'Jingo'.


From: Paul on
~misfit~ wrote:
> Somewhere on teh intarwebs kony wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:15:49 -0500, George(a)here.com wrote:
>>> I have a friend who has a problem that seems to stem from a mismatch
>>> between what his monitor wants and what his computer can provide. The
>>> monitor wants 1680 x 1050, but the closest choices provided by his
>>> AGP graphics card are 1600 x 1000 or 1920 x 1080. He sets it for the
>>> lower number, but the computer changes that to 1920 x 1080. The
>>> too-high resolution causes the image to jiggle. He then has to go to
>>> Control Panel and set the resolution back a notch to 1600 x 1000.
>>>
>>> Beyond another graphics card, how else can he rid himself of this
>>> annoyance?
> [snip]
>> However, it seems likely you have an LCD not CRT monitor
>> since it has a resolution of 1680x1050.
>
> <phew!>
>
> I was reading this thread with ever-increasing incredulity. Unless it's a
> regional thing I've never known of wide-screen CRT monitors. In fact I
> thought that the OP might well be some sort of trolling.

I think it is one of these :-) I really like the evil glow
coming out of the sides.

http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/bchafy/monitor/crtlcd.html

Paul
From: George on
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:59:10 +1300, "~misfit~"
<sore_n_happy(a)yahoo-nospam.com.au> wrote:
>> However, it seems likely you have an LCD not CRT monitor
>> since it has a resolution of 1680x1050.
>
><phew!>
>
>I was reading this thread with ever-increasing incredulity. Unless it's a
>regional thing I've never known of wide-screen CRT monitors. In fact I
>thought that the OP might well be some sort of trolling.

No I was not trolling. It may have seemed so. Sorry about that/

Geo
From: George on
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:50:32 -0600, VanguardLH <V(a)nguard.LH> wrote:


>CRT monitors do not "want" a particular resolution (as do LCD monitors that
>have a native resolution at which they best display an image and every other
>resolution results in interpolation that causes fuzziness or fringe
>coloring). More likely you meant that the CRT has a *maximum* resolution of
>1680x1050.
>
>We are to guess of which OS your "friend" uses? You mentioned Control Panel
>so would that be some version of Windows?

I realized as soon as I posted this item, that I should have been more
specific as to my friend's hardware and software. I wrote him an
email for that info, but he said he was going to bed and would provide
that info in the AM. If/when he does I will provide it. In the
meantime I will forward your reply.

I do know he is running XP SP2 on an older Dell.
I thank you

Geo.

>Assuming this navigation works
>under the unidentified version and edition of Windows, in Control Panel,
>open the Display applet. Under the Settings tab, click the Advanced button.
>Under the Monitor tab, is the actual monitor listed there or some wrong or
>generic version of monitor? You want the correct monitor listed there
>because then the option "Hide modes that this monitor cannot display"
>becomes valid. The monitor's definition (.inf file) specifies what screen
>resolutions and frequencies it can support. Those not supported should not
>be selected.
>
>Go to the monitor manufacturer's web site and get their config file for that
>monitor (which hasn't been identified here). Follow their instructions for
>installing their info file. Then select that monitor (if not already) in
>the Monitor tab, enable the Hide option, and pick a resolution that the
>monitor can actually support.
From: kony on
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:19:21 -0500, Paul <nospam(a)needed.com>
wrote:

>~misfit~ wrote:
>> Somewhere on teh intarwebs kony wrote:
>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:15:49 -0500, George(a)here.com wrote:
>>>> I have a friend who has a problem that seems to stem from a mismatch
>>>> between what his monitor wants and what his computer can provide. The
>>>> monitor wants 1680 x 1050, but the closest choices provided by his
>>>> AGP graphics card are 1600 x 1000 or 1920 x 1080. He sets it for the
>>>> lower number, but the computer changes that to 1920 x 1080. The
>>>> too-high resolution causes the image to jiggle. He then has to go to
>>>> Control Panel and set the resolution back a notch to 1600 x 1000.
>>>>
>>>> Beyond another graphics card, how else can he rid himself of this
>>>> annoyance?
>> [snip]
>>> However, it seems likely you have an LCD not CRT monitor
>>> since it has a resolution of 1680x1050.
>>
>> <phew!>
>>
>> I was reading this thread with ever-increasing incredulity. Unless it's a
>> regional thing I've never known of wide-screen CRT monitors. In fact I
>> thought that the OP might well be some sort of trolling.
>
>I think it is one of these :-) I really like the evil glow
>coming out of the sides.
>
>http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/bchafy/monitor/crtlcd.html
>
> Paul

lol

I can't help but think the owner missed out on an
opportunity to build the whole system into the monitor
casing. I thought about doing that in an old scanner case
sans the LCD panel itself but then found a slimline case I'd
forgotten about and decided the novelty wasn't worth the
time I'd have to spend to do it well.