From: Pubkeybreaker on
Check out NFS(a)Home; help them push towards larger numbers.

http://escatter11.fullerton.edu/nfs/
From: harry on

"Pubkeybreaker" <pubkeybreaker(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:3adfeaf6-843b-4379-b31c-54ace9c44fc1(a)z9g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
> Check out NFS(a)Home; help them push towards larger numbers.
>
> http://escatter11.fullerton.edu/nfs/

JSH already has this done


From: Noob on
harry wrote:

> Pubkeybreaker wrote:
>
>> Check out NFS(a)Home; help them push towards larger numbers.
>>
>> http://escatter11.fullerton.edu/nfs/
>
> JSH already has this done

It's true. JSH has, indeed, already factored 15 and 35.
From: Mok-Kong Shen on
Pubkeybreaker wrote:
> Check out NFS(a)Home; help them push towards larger numbers.
>
> http://escatter11.fullerton.edu/nfs/

I wouldn't refute being called a selfish person, but I think
I would like to take part in some internet collective scientific
computing projects, if the following conditions could be satisfied
(I don't know much about the actual working conditions of such
projects, so part below may be irrelevant):

1. One can dynamically set an upper limit of the CPU load of the
process.

2. One can download on one's initiative the task to be done. During
the actual processing there is no need of an internet connection to
the server of the project. One need not have one's computer on 24 hours
a day, i.e. the process can be interrupted and resumed at any time. One
uploads the result oneself, when the task processing comes to an end.

M. K. Shen


From: Chip Eastham on
On Apr 6, 5:58 am, Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.s...(a)t-online.de> wrote:
> Pubkeybreaker wrote:
> > Check out NFS(a)Home;   help them push towards larger numbers.
>
> >http://escatter11.fullerton.edu/nfs/
>
> I wouldn't refute being called a selfish person, but I think
> I would like to take part in some internet collective scientific
> computing projects, if the following conditions could be satisfied
> (I don't know much about the actual working conditions of such
> projects, so part below may be irrelevant):
>
> 1. One can dynamically set an upper limit of the CPU load of the
> process.
>
> 2. One can download on one's initiative the task to be done. During
> the actual processing there is no need of an internet connection to
> the server of the project. One need not have one's computer on 24 hours
> a day, i.e. the process can be interrupted and resumed at any time. One
> uploads the result oneself, when the task processing comes to an end.
>
> M. K. Shen

Hi, Mok-Kong:

What operating system are you using? The FAQ at
the BOINC website (a utility for sharing workload
used by the NFS(a)HOME project and others) suggests
that if CPU limits are needed, these must be set
by an external utility (external to the application).

I imagine that projects will differ in how much work
is "farmed out" to an individual computer at one
time. The process is no doubt resilient, so if a
workstation crashes or is otherwise taken offline
without completing its assigned task, computation
as a whole is not disrupted.

As computers will differ in their speed, I don't
think the timing of delegated tasks is precisely
metered in advance. However from what I've seen
so far the NFS(a)HOME project assigns task that take
(on my Linux-based dual processor computer) about
1-2 hours to finish. There's a small "manager"
application that let's you see what the "client"
application is doing (at a high level of detail).

regards, chip