From: amerillove on 5 Feb 2010 08:14 Things that work on Linux without problem fail on different versions of Windows with the same hardware.
From: Arno on 6 Feb 2010 14:03 amerillove <amerillove.45ytrf(a)no.email.invalid> wrote: > Things that work on Linux without problem fail on different versions of > Windows with the same hardware. Well, sometimes you find messages about sucessful error recovery in the system log. Linux tries quite hard to make it work again, possibly beacues driver quality in experimental stages may not be very good and getting ti to work again allows for better testing. Arno -- Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email: arno(a)wagner.name GnuPG: ID: 1E25338F FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C 0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F ---- Cuddly UI's are the manifestation of wishful thinking. -- Dylan Evans
From: Cronos on 8 Feb 2010 12:03 amerillove wrote: > Things that work on Linux without problem fail on different versions of > Windows with the same hardware. > > That works both ways, you know?
From: Arno on 8 Feb 2010 19:37 Cronos <cronos(a)sphere.invalid> wrote: > amerillove wrote: >> Things that work on Linux without problem fail on different versions of >> Windows with the same hardware. >> >> > That works both ways, you know? Rather rarely for storage. Under Linux the typical choices are works or does not work at all. With Windows you will often get flakyness instead. The problem is that Windows has a consumer-grade desktop mindset, while Linux has a server-grade mindset. A downside of this is that non-server hardware, for example gaming video cards tend to have far worse support. Arno -- Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email: arno(a)wagner.name GnuPG: ID: 1E25338F FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C 0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F ---- Cuddly UI's are the manifestation of wishful thinking. -- Dylan Evans
From: Cronos on 10 Feb 2010 00:02 Arno wrote: > Rather rarely for storage. Under Linux the typical choices are > works or does not work at all. With Windows you will often > get flakyness instead. The problem is that Windows has a > consumer-grade desktop mindset, while Linux has a server-grade > mindset. A downside of this is that non-server hardware, for > example gaming video cards tend to have far worse support. > > Arno > Yea, well, I am a consumer so that is what I want anyway. But anytime I want to pretend I am a system admin I can fire up the old Mint Linux box anyway, but I rarely do because Windows just does what I want better than Linux.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: 260254 Answers to your Computer question! 34 Next: Mini USB pocket HD Safe For Credit Cards? |