From: mpc755 on
On Aug 1, 7:27 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/1/10 1:23 PM, Jacko wrote:
>
> > What is the characteristic impedence of space, and why would nothing
> > have an impedance?
>
>    You mean the vacuum?
>
>    See:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impedance_of_free_space
>        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impedance_of_free_space#Exact_value

What ripples?

'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html

"Astronomers using NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view
of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two
galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark matter, which is
somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the
water."

The ripple will eventually reach the Earth and this is evidence dark
matter exists from the galaxy cluster to the Earth. This is evidence
dark matter is the medium of space in which light waves propagate.
From: mpc755 on
On Aug 1, 4:58 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Aug 1, 11:44 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Aug 1, 9:16 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 1, 2:02 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On 7/31/10 11:49 PM, Kali Hawa wrote:
>
> > > > > Can a bigbang occur within our Universe?
>
> > 'Mysterious Cosmic 'Dark Flow' Tracked Deeper into Universe'http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/releases/2010/10-023.html
>
> > 'The clusters appear to be moving along a line extending from our
> > solar system toward Centaurus/Hydra, but the direction of this motion
> > is less certain. Evidence indicates that the clusters are headed
> > outward along this path, away from Earth, but the team cannot yet rule
> > out the opposite flow. "We detect motion along this axis, but right
> > now our data cannot state as strongly as we'd like whether the
> > clusters are coming or going," Kashlinsky said.'
>
> > The clusters are headed along this path because the Universe is, or
> > the local Universe we exist in is, a jet stream. Analogous to the jet
> > stream of a black hole.
>
> > The following is an image of a jet stream:
>
> >http://aether.lbl.gov/image_all.html
>
> > The reason for the expansion of the universe is the continual emission
> > of dark matter. In the image above, '1st Stars' is where the
> > conditions enable dark matter to be compressed into matter.
>
> > It's not the Big Bang. It's the Big Ongoing.
>
> > > >    Why not?
>
> > > --------------
> > > idiot
> > > space is nothing
> > > so
> > > how can a nothing be  created from   another nothing !!
> > > you are not a physicist
> > > go deal with philosophy
> > > and even in phylosophy
> > > you dont make any   sense
> > > Y.P
>
> > > ----------------------
>
> > What ripples?
>
> > 'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_featur...
>
> > "Astronomers using NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view
> > of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two
> > galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark matter, which is
> > somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the
> > water."
>
> > The ripple will eventually reach the Earth and this is evidence dark
> > matter exists from the galaxy cluster to the Earth. This is evidence
> > dark matter is the medium of space in which light waves propagate.
>
> IF nothing gets out of a black hole then we are not seeing black holes
> but short of a black hole. Jet streams would not exist for real black
> holes.
>
> Mitch Raemsch

It is not that nothing gets out. It is that nothing vanishes into a
black hole. When the dark matter and matter fall past the event
horizon of a black hole the matter and dark matter are emitted into
the jet stream as dark matter.
From: Inertial on
"Y.Porat" wrote in message
news:e16aa84e-3763-4a0e-a343-a7b620ba382f(a)m1g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
[snip me explaining where Porat is right and where porat is wrong, which he
ignores]
>-------------

Now we watch as Porat described himself....

>a**** lost case***** of an
>imbecile crook subhuman pigshit

Couldn't have described him better (actually, I probably could)

O course, I notice that Porat has NOTHING to say about the points of physics
and experimental evidence I raised .. just name calling. Truly pathetic.




From: Y.Porat on
On Aug 1, 8:23 pm, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> What is the characteristic impedence of space, and why would nothing
> have an impedance?

-----------------------
it is not the net vacuum that has
impedance
you find impedance
only if there is mass init
for instance

the measuring tools that yopu use
to find it
HAS MASS!!

so jus stick it to your skull
the new basic iron rule of physics

NO MASS -THE ONLY ONE-
NO REAL PHYSICS !!

ATB
Y.Porat
------------------------------------
From: Jacko on
On 4 Aug, 04:50, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 1, 8:23 pm, Jacko <jackokr...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > What is the characteristic impedence of space, and why would nothing
> > have an impedance?
>
> -----------------------
> it is not the net vacuum that has
> impedance
> you find impedance
> only if there is mass init
> for instance
>
> the measuring  tools that yopu use
> to find it
> HAS MASS!!
>
> so   jus stick it to your skull
> the new  basic iron rule of physics
>
> NO MASS -THE ONLY ONE-
> NO REAL PHYSICS !!
>
> ATB
> Y.Porat
> ------------------------------------

NO SPACE WARP NO REAL PHYSICS. MASS IS SECONDARY. ;-)