Prev: readline/termcap problems compiling Samba 3.5.0rc1 on CentOS 5.4 64-bit
Next: [Samba] flushing sambacache
From: Jeremy Allison on 29 Jan 2010 13:20 On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 05:46:14PM +0100, Åke Holmlund wrote: > Hello! > > I have sent this a few days ago but I don't think it made it to the > mailinglist. > > We have problems connecting to printers (spoolss) from Windows Server > 2008 (64-bit, domain member) and Windows 7 (64-bit, NOT domain member). > When trying to connect to the printers we get an error message saying > "Windows cannot connect to the printer. Operation could not be completed > (error 0x0000000d)". Connecting as a "standard" user or a domain > administrator makes no difference. > > If I try to add a printer on the server from Windows 2008, there are no > ports to choose from in the "Choose a printer port" dialog. > > Connecting to the printers is no problem from Win XP, Win Vista and Win > 2003 (all 32-bit). When trying to add a printer from Windows 2003, the > "Samba Printer Port" shows up in the "Choose a printer port" dialog. > > The Samba (domain) server is 3.4.4 running on Solaris 10 (Sparc). > > Any ideas what the problem can be or where to start looking? Ok, here's the deal. If you have 64-bit Windows clients at the moment you need to be using 3.3.10, not anything later. If you're using 32-bit Windows clients, you can use 3.4.5 or later. The reason (and Guenther can correct me if I'm wrong), is that in 3.4.x we changed from the hand-marshalled SPOOLSS RPC we used in 3.3.x, which was mostly correct after being worked on for many years, to pidl-generated SPOOLSS RPC directly from the idl files. Now our idl files are correct, but it turns out that the Windows idl parser for SPOOLSS is itself custom, and won't accept the normally marshalled RPC packets that the pidl-generated code creates. Guenter and Metze have been doing a lot of work on fixing this, and this is why 32-bit Windows clients work in 3.4.5. However there are still some changes needed for 64-bit Windows clients, and this will probably make it into an early patch for 3.5.x (it won't make 3.5.0, as it's too late to test the changes needed before we ship next month). I'm going to write this up as a tech-note for the next 3.4.x release and for 3.5.0 and get it into the release notes. Hope this hasn't caused you too many problems. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
From: Helmut Hullen on 30 Jan 2010 02:00 Hallo, Jeremy, Du meintest am 29.01.10: >> We have problems connecting to printers (spoolss) from Windows >> Server 2008 (64-bit, domain member) and Windows 7 (64-bit, NOT >> domain member). [...] > Ok, here's the deal. If you have 64-bit Windows clients at the > moment you need to be using 3.3.10, not anything later. If you're > using 32-bit Windows clients, you can use 3.4.5 or later. Only for "spoolss" or CUPS, or for the whole Samba bundle? Viele Gruesse! Helmut -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
From: Jeremy Allison on 30 Jan 2010 13:00 On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 07:36:00AM +0100, Helmut Hullen wrote: > Hallo, Jeremy, > > Du meintest am 29.01.10: > > >> We have problems connecting to printers (spoolss) from Windows > >> Server 2008 (64-bit, domain member) and Windows 7 (64-bit, NOT > >> domain member). > > [...] > > > Ok, here's the deal. If you have 64-bit Windows clients at the > > moment you need to be using 3.3.10, not anything later. If you're > > using 32-bit Windows clients, you can use 3.4.5 or later. > > Only for "spoolss" or CUPS, or for the whole Samba bundle? I'm referring to the whole of Samba. Although the issue only affects SPOOLSS you can't just install that part of Samba. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
From: Åke Holmlund on 1 Feb 2010 09:50
Thank You for making that clear! New problem. I have been trying to set up a temporary Samba server to handle printing until this problem gets fixed. I am running 3.3.10 on a Sun Solaris 10 machine. From a Win 2003 (32 bit) server I can install print drivers and print ok but from Win 2008 R2 and Win 7 it´s not working. In Win 2008 R2, if I try to connect to a printer with no drivers installed on the server I get a dialog box stating that there are no drivers installed on the server. This is as expected. However, if I go to properties there is NO dialog about missing drivers. Clicking on the Advanced tab and then "New Driver" starts the "Add Printer" wizard but when I get to the "Printer Driver Selection" there are no drivers to choose from. All I can see is the text "(Unable to find any drivers for this device)" If I try to connect to a printer that has a driver installed, I get error 0x000006d1 Any ideas? à ke Holmlund --On 29 januari 2010 10.09.57 -0800 Jeremy Allison <jra(a)samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 05:46:14PM +0100, à ke Holmlund wrote: >> Hello! >> >> I have sent this a few days ago but I don't think it made it to the >> mailinglist. >> >> We have problems connecting to printers (spoolss) from Windows Server >> 2008 (64-bit, domain member) and Windows 7 (64-bit, NOT domain member). >> When trying to connect to the printers we get an error message saying >> "Windows cannot connect to the printer. Operation could not be completed >> (error 0x0000000d)". Connecting as a "standard" user or a domain >> administrator makes no difference. >> >> If I try to add a printer on the server from Windows 2008, there are no >> ports to choose from in the "Choose a printer port" dialog. >> >> Connecting to the printers is no problem from Win XP, Win Vista and Win >> 2003 (all 32-bit). When trying to add a printer from Windows 2003, the >> "Samba Printer Port" shows up in the "Choose a printer port" dialog. >> >> The Samba (domain) server is 3.4.4 running on Solaris 10 (Sparc). >> >> Any ideas what the problem can be or where to start looking? > > Ok, here's the deal. If you have 64-bit Windows clients at the > moment you need to be using 3.3.10, not anything later. If you're > using 32-bit Windows clients, you can use 3.4.5 or later. > > The reason (and Guenther can correct me if I'm wrong), is > that in 3.4.x we changed from the hand-marshalled SPOOLSS RPC > we used in 3.3.x, which was mostly correct after being worked > on for many years, to pidl-generated SPOOLSS RPC directly from > the idl files. Now our idl files are correct, but it turns > out that the Windows idl parser for SPOOLSS is itself custom, > and won't accept the normally marshalled RPC packets that > the pidl-generated code creates. > > Guenter and Metze have been doing a lot of work on fixing > this, and this is why 32-bit Windows clients work in 3.4.5. > However there are still some changes needed for 64-bit Windows > clients, and this will probably make it into an early patch > for 3.5.x (it won't make 3.5.0, as it's too late to test the > changes needed before we ship next month). > > I'm going to write this up as a tech-note for the next > 3.4.x release and for 3.5.0 and get it into the release > notes. Hope this hasn't caused you too many problems. > > Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba |