Can we detect the bullshit of -c?
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Proposed experiment for detection of BP's cap&trade in the "financial reform bill."
Next: Total Object Mass is the cumulative sum of an object's atoms
From: Earle Jones on 15 Jul 2010 23:45 In article <4bd7a054$0$635$8046368a(a)newsreader.iphouse.net>, tom <news4792(a)taring.org> wrote: > On 4/27/2010 1:28 PM, BURT wrote: > > <SNIP lots of, well, to put it nicely, stuff> > > >>>> There are inbetween energy shifts. Head on and behind are maximum. To > >>>> the side of motion or 90 degree absorption of light will give its > >>>> fundamental energy. This will have no shift. > >> > >>>> Mitch Raemsch > >> > >>> Thanks, that's always good to know. > >> > >>> ~ BG > >> > >> You swallowed that? > >> > >> Double-A- Hide quoted text - > >> > >> - Show quoted text - > > > > Its a sinch. There is no red shift to sideways light absorption so > > there must be inbetween angles of Doppler energy. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > Never took physics, huh? Or if all of you did, you never understood > vectors. * Clearly, none of you have heard of the transverse Doppler effect. earle *
From: Earle Jones on 15 Jul 2010 23:47 In article <260c877c-e126-4328-8fec-024aece891e3(a)42g2000prb.googlegroups.com>, BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 27, 9:53�pm, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On Apr 27, 7:41�pm, tom <news4...(a)taring.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/27/2010 1:28 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > <SNIP lots of, well, to put it nicely, stuff> > > > > > >>>> There are inbetween energy shifts. Head on and behind are maximum. To > > > >>>> the side of motion or 90 degree absorption of light will give its > > > >>>> fundamental energy. This will have no shift. > > > > > >>>> Mitch Raemsch > > > > > >>> Thanks, that's always good to know. > > > > > >>> � ~ BG > > > > > >> You swallowed that? > > > > > >> Double-A- Hide quoted text - > > > > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > > > > Its a sinch. There is no red shift to sideways light absorption so > > > > there must be inbetween angles of Doppler energy. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > Never took physics, huh? �Or if all of you did, you never understood > > > vectors. > > > > > tom > > > K0TAR > > > > I'm not exactly convinced that Einstein took physics. > > > > �~ BG- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > Einstein transcended his education. > > Mitch Raemsch Mitch: Have you transcended your education? Have you had an education? Where did you study? Where did you learn your Physics? Thanks, earle *
From: Androcles on 15 Jul 2010 23:52
"Earle Jones" <earle.jones(a)comcast.net> wrote in message news:earle.jones-926267.20455415072010(a)news.giganews.com... | In article <4bd7a054$0$635$8046368a(a)newsreader.iphouse.net>, | tom <news4792(a)taring.org> wrote: | | > On 4/27/2010 1:28 PM, BURT wrote: | > | > <SNIP lots of, well, to put it nicely, stuff> | > | > >>>> There are inbetween energy shifts. Head on and behind are maximum. To | > >>>> the side of motion or 90 degree absorption of light will give its | > >>>> fundamental energy. This will have no shift. | > >> | > >>>> Mitch Raemsch | > >> | > >>> Thanks, that's always good to know. | > >> | > >>> ~ BG | > >> | > >> You swallowed that? | > >> | > >> Double-A- Hide quoted text - | > >> | > >> - Show quoted text - | > > | > > Its a sinch. There is no red shift to sideways light absorption so | > > there must be inbetween angles of Doppler energy. | > > | > > Mitch Raemsch | > | > Never took physics, huh? Or if all of you did, you never understood | > vectors. | | * | Clearly, none of you have heard of the transverse Doppler effect. | | earle | * * Clearly, you are an ignorant fuckwit. * |