Prev: You likee digitar camela? Come to Happy Lucky Electronicssite!
Next: You likee digitar camela? Come to Happy Lucky Electronics site!
From: Nervous Nick on 20 Apr 2010 21:01 On Apr 20, 1:03 pm, George Kerby <ghost_top...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On 4/20/10 12:43 PM, in article > WImdnfpeYZ1CelDWnZ2dnUVZ_jidn...(a)giganews.com, "Frank ess" > > > > <fr...(a)fshe2fs.com> wrote: > > > Tzortzakakis Dimitris wrote: > >> ? "Bruce" <docnews2...(a)gmail.com> ?????? ??? ?????? > >>news:o9krs5p6muj0b1fk6c427j440utu6p5aie(a)4ax.com... > >>> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:38:14 GMT, "Dudley Hanks" > >>> <dha...(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote: > > >>>> Now, there's a payday ... > > >>>>http://www.edmontonjournal.com/entertainment/Photo+worth+million+word.... > >>>> 503/story.html > > >>> So many words, yet no sign of the image that is being discussed. > >>> :-( > >> Probably, they will put it in a gallery where you'll have to pay an > >> entrance fee to see it, or it will end in a private collection... > > >http://www.christies.com/lotfinder/lot_details.aspx?intObjectID=5315268 > > A million bucks for a snapshot?!? > > I'm not 'buying' it... Exactly my sentiment. The image contains zero compelling attributes and quite a few annoying ones. It's not even a very good snapshot. I had to check the date on that to make sure it wasn't 1 April. Sheesh. -- YOP...
From: Allen on 20 Apr 2010 21:27 Dudley Hanks wrote: > Now, there's a payday ... > > http://www.edmontonjournal.com/entertainment/Photo+worth+million+words/2927503/story.html > > After looking at some of his work online, I think that $1,000,000 must be Zimbabwe dollars. I think $10 would be a more reasonable price--if a light box is included. Allen
From: Gary Edstrom on 20 Apr 2010 21:36 On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:27:27 -0500, Allen <allent(a)austin.rr.com> wrote: >Dudley Hanks wrote: >> Now, there's a payday ... >> >> http://www.edmontonjournal.com/entertainment/Photo+worth+million+words/2927503/story.html >> >> >After looking at some of his work online, I think that $1,000,000 must >be Zimbabwe dollars. I think $10 would be a more reasonable price--if a >light box is included. >Allen As with most other things in this price range, you are paying for the name of the artist or the history of the item and not the item's inherent value or what it depicts. Gary
From: sobriquet on 20 Apr 2010 22:02 On 20 apr, 20:16, "Richard" <smith...(a)btinternet.com.invalid> wrote: > "Bruce" <docnews2...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:o9krs5p6muj0b1fk6c427j440utu6p5aie(a)4ax.com... > > > On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:38:14 GMT, "Dudley Hanks" > > <dha...(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote: > > >>Now, there's a payday ... > > >>http://www.edmontonjournal.com/entertainment/Photo+worth+million+word.... > > > So many words, yet no sign of the image that is being discussed. :-( > > http://www.imageandnarrative.be/Images_de_l_invisible/Images/VG-Fig-2... > :) Those clueless clowns at Christie's are so funny. They didn't even bother to shuffle the tiles, making it all too easy to stitch them up. http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/1026/stitch.jpg
From: Savageduck on 20 Apr 2010 22:16
On 2010-04-20 18:36:31 -0700, Gary Edstrom <GEdstrom(a)PacBell.Net> said: > On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:27:27 -0500, Allen <allent(a)austin.rr.com> wrote: > >> Dudley Hanks wrote: >>> Now, there's a payday ... >>> >>> http://www.edmontonjournal.com/entertainment/Photo+worth+million+words/2927503/story.html After >>> >> looking at some of his work online, I think that $1,000,000 must >> be Zimbabwe dollars. I think $10 would be a more reasonable price--if a >> light box is included. >> Allen > > As with most other things in this price range, you are paying for the > name of the artist or the history of the item and not the item's > inherent value or what it depicts. > > Gary ....and he is who exactly? There is no way Jeff Wall has a name worth paying for. The inherent value of his work may be great for some, but I cannot find THAT value in any of his work. This is no Adams, Cappa, Larry Burrows, Stieglitz or even dare I say, Herb Ritts. -- Regards, Savageduck |