From: John Larkin on
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:34:04 -0600, "Tim Williams"
<tmoranwms(a)charter.net> wrote:

>"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
>news:ot6al5pi072rjuve8kn52upk48m6c09d53(a)4ax.com...
>> I tested some 0603 16 volt ceramic caps to see when they'd fail. At
>> 120 volts, the limit of my supply, they were still OK.
>
>Of course, they'd be no good at bypassing at that voltage. The D-E curve
>(think B-H) is going to be flat as Kansas.
>
>Tim

Why are you spoiling my fun?

John

From: Tim Williams on
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
news:6udal5t621q5fekd3j96uqlc6h9v1o28oh(a)4ax.com...
>>Of course, they'd be no good at bypassing at that voltage. The D-E curve
>>(think B-H) is going to be flat as Kansas.
>
> Why are you spoiling my fun?

Fun? You aren't having fun, the damn thing didn't even explode. ;-)

Tim

--
Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk.
Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms


From: John Larkin on
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:16:46 -0600, "Tim Williams"
<tmoranwms(a)charter.net> wrote:

>"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
>news:6udal5t621q5fekd3j96uqlc6h9v1o28oh(a)4ax.com...
>>>Of course, they'd be no good at bypassing at that voltage. The D-E curve
>>>(think B-H) is going to be flat as Kansas.
>>
>> Why are you spoiling my fun?
>
>Fun? You aren't having fun, the damn thing didn't even explode. ;-)
>
>Tim

Ceramic caps are nonlinear enough that you could make a useful
parametric amplifier from some.

Hmmm, and a fA-sensitive amplifier.

John

From: Tim Williams on
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
news:fahal5h0g29cg6dbl69ngejqd9javkiujj(a)4ax.com...
> Ceramic caps are nonlinear enough that you could make a useful
> parametric amplifier from some.
>
> Hmmm, and a fA-sensitive amplifier.

I recall HP already had made a leakage meter like that, using diode
capacitance instead.

With pA-sensitive op-amps available these days, there isn't much point in
doing that. Yeah, you said fA, but you'd be taking days to accumulate any
charge to measure it. Unless it was a microscopic hunk, like if you got at
a single cell of FeRAM. Ah, but a monolithic femtoammeter would perform
well, wouldn't it? Still, it would be quite noisy. You might end up with a
better thermometer.

Tim

--
Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk.
Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms


From: Wimpie on
On 19 ene, 00:39, blanko <electro...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> Are capacitors ESD sensitive?  Please explain.
>
> Ceramtic?
>
> Tantalum?
>
> I know that some of the ceramic caps that I am working with are rated
> at 25 volts.  An ESD zap can be multiples of 1000 V.  I believe that
> the capacitors are ESD sensitive because I will exceed the max rated
> voltage.  Is this true?
>
> Thank you.
>
> -E

Hello,

Yes ESD can destroy MLCC capacitors, even below the voltage breakdown
limit. Try to locate "DC, AC and Pulse Load
of Multilayer Ceramic Capacitors". This is a former PHILIPS document.
You can probably find it on www.koaspeer.com also. There are more
documents around, but this one gives the data in an easy to understand
way.

If you can't locate it, please contact me.

Best regards,

Wim
PA3DJS
www.tetech.nl
without abc your PM will reach me.