Centralised MsgBox
in [Visual Basic]
|
Prev: crack for VSFlex8 in VB6.0
Next: Component Handles
From: Tom Shelton on 8 Oct 2009 01:15 On 2009-10-08, Tom Shelton <tom_shelton(a)comcastXXXXXXX.net> wrote: > On 2009-10-08, Bill McCarthy <bill(a)localhost.com> wrote: >> Hi Tom, >> >> "Tom Shelton" <tom_shelton(a)comcastXXXXXXX.net> wrote in message >> news:OUaDm47RKHA.1236(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>> On 2009-10-08, Bill McCarthy <bill(a)localhost.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> GoSub does have some advantages but it does also produce hard to maintain >>>> spaghetti code. >>> >>> I never saw anything wrong with gosub as a language structure, but since I >>> came to the VB party in version 4 when it was already documented as being >>> a >>> huge perfromance hit to use - I never got in the habbit of using it in >>> VB... >>> >> >> Right it was really from an era long ago and had long been abandoned without >> replacement ;) >> >> >>> Though, I used it quite frequently in my first formal programming job - >>> since >>> for the first year, I spend part of my time dealing with code written in a >>> form of basic called IMS/BASIC - it was port of buisness basic to unix >>> and >>> unix like systems :) >>> >> >> Not familiar with it. Did it have formal structures like UDT's or classes ? >> Dang - forgot to answer this. No classes, but it did have UDT's. This was a very old dialect of basic :) -- Tom Shelton
From: Eduardo on 8 Oct 2009 03:01 Tom Shelton escribi�: > var list = new List<int>() {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; > list.ForEach ( i => Console.WriteLine (i) ); Is this BASIC??? What an ugly code! <int>{}; =>; ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esoteric_programming_language ) PS: One of the reasons I had chosen VB over Delphi is because I hate braces and semicolons. When will we have a new version of VB based on BASIC?
From: Tom Shelton on 8 Oct 2009 03:48 On 2009-10-08, Eduardo <mm(a)mm.com> wrote: > Tom Shelton escribi�: > >> var list = new List<int>() {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; >> list.ForEach ( i => Console.WriteLine (i) ); > > Is this BASIC??? > That's C#. Don't freak out dude! It was an example of why lambda's are limited in the current version of VB - it takes more code to accomplish what that 2 line C# snipit does. > What an ugly code! > I personally like it :) ><int>{}; >=>; > > ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esoteric_programming_language ) > > PS: One of the reasons I had chosen VB over Delphi is because I hate > braces and semicolons. To each his own. I love c style syntax - always have. Not a big fan of what little pascal i've messed with over the years - never caught my interest really. > > When will we have a new version of VB based on BASIC? Well, some of us believe we do - but, lets not get into that argument. -- Tom Shelton
From: Mike Williams on 8 Oct 2009 03:54 "Scott M." <s-mar(a)nospam.nospam> wrote in message news:%23fTszB5RKHA.5052(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > You realise that in your response, you baiscally > made my point, right? No. I realise that in your response you basically made my point. Mike
From: Eduardo on 8 Oct 2009 04:13
Tom Shelton escribi�: >> Is this BASIC??? >> > > That's C#. I feel better now. LOL! I thought it was the alient VB. |