Prev: Is this it?
Next: theory behind the upper limit approx 400 million light years Chapt 11, Space is EM; magnet & iron filings Experiment #106; ATOM TOTALITY
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 23 May 2010 02:04
Enrico wrote:
>
> Seen this one yet?
>
> The Electric Universe model grew out of a broad interdisciplinary
> approach to science. It is not a technique taught in universities. The
> Electric Universe is based more on observations and experiment than
> abstract theory. It recognizes connections between diverse
> disciplines. It concludes that the crucial requirement for
> understanding the universe is to take fully into account the basic
> electrical nature of atoms and their interactions. Strangely, this is
> not the case in conventional cosmology where weaker magnetism and the
> infinitely weaker force of gravity rule the cosmos. Such a
> simplification may suit a theoretical physics based on electrical
> neutrality of matter in Earthly laboratories but it does not apply in
> space where plasma dominates.
>
> The Electric Universe
> http://www.holoscience.com/synopsis.php?page=2
>
>
> Enrico

I was trying to remember the name of the Swede who worked on
magnetohydrodynamics.

Finally Hannes Alfven and his quote:
--- quoting Alfven ---
In order to understand the phenomena in a certain plasma region, it is
necessary to map not only the magnetic but also the electric field and
the electric currents. Space is filled with a network of currents
which transfer energy and momentum over large or very large distances.
The currents often pinch to filamentary or surface currents. The
latter are likely to give space, as also interstellar and
intergalactic space, a cellular structure.
--- end quote ---

Now if we look at Juric's and Jarrett's mapping of the galaxies and
make a basic assumption that the redshift has it all wrong. That the
3rd layer with the P-P superclusters and P-I are the
edges of the observable universe and all the layers beyond are
actually closer to Earth than the 3rd layer.

And the way to reassemble the Juric and Jarrett mappings is to make it
such that multiple
rings are the full mapping. So that there are at least one or two
rings in the 1st layer, and
one or two rings in the 2nd layer and one or two rings in the 3rd
layer.

What I suspect is that when doing a magnet and sheet of cardboard with
iron fillings
above that the concentric rings of iron fillings due to the magnet
present is the same
sort of pattern that Juric and Jarrett should eventually come out
with.

Now looking at the Jarrett mapping, the Great Wall and Sloan Great
Wall are probably
the most dense banded ring. The we have the P-P with P-I ring next.
Now we fit the
other superclusters together, ignoring their redshifts as mostly wrong
distances and that
they fit together forming in total about 6 or 7 rings from the three
layers. When Juric
and Jarrett use only redshifts, to me is like a jigsaw puzzle put
together by an infant
who does not know the rules that the pieces fit together because they
belong together
and where the infant forces two pieces together that never belonged
together.

Now my iron filings are not small enough so I have to go and get some
from a metal shop
and to see how many bands of rings I can form.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Is this it?
Next: theory behind the upper limit approx 400 million light years Chapt 11, Space is EM; magnet & iron filings Experiment #106; ATOM TOTALITY