Prev: A very uneducated culture?
Next: Chapt7 Tifft quantized galaxy speeds, #232 Atom Totality
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 25 Jul 2010 01:12

Chapter 7
Subject: Correlation of quantized galaxy speeds 72km per second with
Cosmic Microwave

Here is a good website that explains quantized galaxy redshifts
which implies quantized galaxy speeds.
--- quoting from http://www.cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/ce/redshift.html
Remarkably, using the same solar-motion correction as before, the
galaxies' redshifts again bunched around certain specific values. But
this time the favored redshifts were separated by exactly 1/2 of the
basic 72 km per second interval. This is clearly evident. Even
allowing
for this change to a 36 km per second interval, the chance of
accidentally producing such a preference is less than 4 in 1000. It is
therefore concluded that at least some classes of galaxy redshifts are
quantized in steps that are simple fractions of 72 km per second.
--- end quoting ---

Now that quantized galaxy speeds (QGS) should correlate with
the uniformity of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR)
And that correlation between CMBR and QGS would
imply a Cosmic uniform QGS, or a constant and not a variable.

So that the QGS should be the same near the Sloan Great
Wall and Great Wall.

On Aug 17, 1:00=A0am, Archimedes Plutonium
<plutonium.archime...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
snipped
>
> Now I need to look up the Tifft quantized galaxy positions or speeds.
> I need to see if those Tifft quantizations follows a square pattern as
> in the above Jupiter pattern or whether the
> Tifft pattern is a pure doubling or halving and not a squaring.
> I seem to remember it was a doubling pattern.
>

Looked up Tifft quantized redshifts and found this in Wikipedia:
--- quoting Wikipedia ---
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, four studies on redshift
quantization were performed:

In 1989, Martin R. Croasdale reported finding a quantization of
redshifts using a different sample of galaxies in increments of 72 km/
s (=C4z=3D2.4x10-4).[15]
In 1990, Bruce Guthrie and William Napier reported finding a "possible
periodicity" of the same magnitude for a slightly larger data set
limited to bright spiral galaxies and excluding other types[16]
In 1992, Guthrie and Napier proposed the observation of a different
periodicity in increments of =C4z=3D1.24x10-4 in a sample of 89
galaxies
[17]
In 1992, G. Paal, et al. [18] and A. Holba, et al. [19] reanalyzed the
redshift data from a fairly large sample of galaxies and concluded
that there was an unexplained periodicity of redshifts.
In 1994, A. Holba, et al. [20] also reanalyzed the redshift data of
quasars and concluded that there was unexplained periodicity of
redshifts in this sample, too.
--- end quoting ---

So it looks like a linear doubling or halving and not a squaring.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: A very uneducated culture?
Next: Chapt7 Tifft quantized galaxy speeds, #232 Atom Totality