Prev: Quantum Gravity 396.0: India Relates Difference of Exponentials (as in 395) to Visual Perception
Next: At the extreme of gravity there is a limit
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 16 May 2010 12:32


Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(snipped)
>
> III. Observational and experimental support
> (9) Telescope as distance tool and upper limit of telescope in distance is about 400 million
> light years
> (10) experiment that shows us what the redshift truly is-- curvature
> of the lobes of an Atom Totality
> (11) density and distribution of all the galaxies
> (12) Tifft quantized galaxy speeds

Well, I am waiting for the prism to arrive to do the second
experiment. According to the
fiberglass panel experiment the prism should turn out the same end
results.

(a) oncoming white headlights of cars is redshifted by untinted panel
(b) stationary white lights are unaffected and remain white by
untinted panel
(c) a blue tinted fiberglass panel causes a stationary or moving white
light to "blueshift"
(d) a red light is even more redshifted by a untinted panel

The major difference between Refraction Redshift and Doppler Redshift
is that
they are reversed in motion, in that a oncoming light source is
redshifted in the
Refraction whereas in Doppler it is claimed to be blueshifted for
oncoming.

I expect the Prism Experiment to duplicate those results.

But let us now begin to use and utilize the Telescope as the finest
distance
measure of any astronomy tool.

How long have we known of the existence of the Great Wall? How long
have
we known that the Great Wall is redshifted? When was our first
telescopic
image of the Great Wall?

We could ask the very same questions of any of the quasars.

Now we ask the important questions. The questions that will trashcan
the
Big Bang and its Doppler redshift.

Ever since we first noted the telescopic image of the Great Wall and
measured its redshift. If the Great Wall were moving away from us
at such a terrific speed, then the telescopic images of the Great Wall
over the decades would have become worse images since it is moving
away at such terrific speeds. But the reverse is the true history.
Ever
since we first viewed the Great Wall and done measurements on the
Great Wall, the images of the Great Wall have improved steadily over
the years and decades. In fact, the images by the telescopes have
improved so much that we have imaged the Sloan Great Wall which
resides much further away with a larger redshift.

So here is a case where the data totally disagrees with the Big Bang
and Doppler redshift. The data agrees with a Refraction Redshift in
that the Great Wall and Sloan Great Wall and the quasars are not
moving away from us at a terrific recessional speed, but the reverse,
in that they are moving towards Earth because their telescopic images
from one decade to the next is vastly improving.

Now let us take this case to the nearby local group of galaxies. It is
reported that some of them are allegedly moving towards the Earth and
Milky Way with a blueshift. According to the fiberglass experiment,
a blueshift usually means the source is stationary with respect to
observer. So are these blueshifted objects become a higher telescopic
resolution over time? Not to my knowledge. And if the Doppler Redshift
were true, the redshifted local group of galaxies would become dimmer
or more fuzzy in detail over time, of its stars within those
redshifted
galaxies because the theory of Doppler redshift is that they are
recessional
speeds away from our telescopes. But the data tells us the reverse,
that
we are having more clarity of picture image and resolution of these
redshifted
objects.

So the data of redshift and of telescopic image resolution tells us a
reverse
truth, that the redshift means the motion is coming towards us, not
away
from us. And the only really funny part of this story, is that how
long or
how long can this mistake by astronomers not realizing they have it
all
turned around, continue? With each new view of the Great Wall and
becoming
an ever sharper image, how long before some astronomer says "hold on,
our redshift ideas were all backwards in terms of truth."

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Quantum Gravity 396.0: India Relates Difference of Exponentials (as in 395) to Visual Perception
Next: At the extreme of gravity there is a limit