Prev: Quantum Gravity 395.5: USA (Wisconsin) Advances Unification by Delta Functions
Next: The Insanity Grows
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 14 May 2010 16:30
Now according to Jarrett's website:

--- quoting ---
http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/jarrett/papers/LSS/

The seventh layer (0.05 < z < 0.06) contains the backside of the
Shapley Concentration, while the Sculpter supercluster dominates the
southern hemisphere. The eighth and final layer (z > 0.06) contains
the most distant structures that 2MASS resolves, including the Pisces-
Cetus (located behind P-P), Bootes (located behind Hercules),
Horologium and Corona Borealis galaxy clusters. At these faint flux
levels, the photometric redshifts are losing their ability to discern
the cosmic web beyond 300 Mpc, smearing and degrading the resolution
of the 3-D construct.
--- end quoting ---

He claims the photometric redshifts are too degraded beyond 300 Mpc
which is about
1 billion light years distance. Yet many reported distances are far
beyond 1 billion
light years such as the two supernova reported at 4 billion light
years or the
quasars routinely reported beyond 1 billion light years.

What I am argueing in this chapter is that the telescope itself, the
finest available
telescope cannot see beyond 400 million light years due to the Cosmic
density
of atoms of about 1 atom per cubic meter of space. The light from a
quasar at
1 billion light years away is never able to form a image since every
one of its
photons will be blocked as it travels through space after 400 million
light years
distance. (This upper limit distance goes for radio telescopes also.)

Now probability theory is not what convinces most people that a idea
is true.
Some would hanker to say that the atom in each cubic meter lattice
cell are
all in one position which allows light to travel any distance without
being
interfered or blocked.

But I would rejoinder with this arguement, that the Probability
theory, called
Orchard Visibility Problem and its related problems, make several
predictions
of note. One such prediction is that the Upper Limit of Viewing
results in a
RING structure. And we see this RING structure in Jarrett's third
layer.

Which to me would then mean that the mapping of the Cosmos by Jarrett
is no further than the 400 million light year distance and that all
the other
layers beyond the third lie within those first three layers. The
quasars and
Great Walls are actually much closer to Earth than what Jarrett's
mapping
conveys. If you can see a image of a distant object in the telescope
(radio
or otherwise) then it means the object is 400 million or less light
years away.

Now, another prediction of a Orchard Visible Problem is that at the
furthest
reaches of the Orchard, in the case of astronomy and Jarrett's
mapping, the
objects look all identical in terms of size and proportion and what
they are.
So at the end of the Orchard, we see all the trees of the same small
size
and forming that RING boundary.

Now do we see the same in Astronomy? Of course we do, for we see at
the
last layer almost nothing but quasars. Jarrett thinks they are highly
energetic
fastly moving away from Earth with their redshift. I think they are
fastly moving
towards Earth with a refraction redshift, and are normal galaxies much
closer
to Earth and are about 200 to 400 million light years away. They are
the ring
of orchard trees at the edge of visibility.

Now there are other predictions of the Orchard Visibility Problem, but
I have
to work on them.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Quantum Gravity 395.5: USA (Wisconsin) Advances Unification by Delta Functions
Next: The Insanity Grows