Prev: Gravity Is Singularity Of Quantum-Continuum.By Aiya-Oba
Next: Ternary formula for a decimal expression
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 30 Apr 2010 15:00

Chapter 4
Subject: distribution of galaxies implies a cosmic atom; 4th ed; Atom
Totality theory


As mentioned in previous posts, I will start 5th edition
of this book as soon as this 4th is completed in that
I need this book organized for once. Organizing has become
elusive for me as yet in this book writing, due mostly to the fact
that my creativity and curiousity displaces organizing. I have posts
scattered from
different chapters and is annoying. So
I want this book organized and will devote full attention
to that prospect in the 5th ed.


High Energy Ray from direction of Centaurus


- Show quoted text -
Now recent news of a journal report of a high energy Ray in the
direction of Centaurus A about 13.7 million light years away
and of another Ray about 326 million light years away makes me
want to give some order to these newsflashes because they do not
make the basic information briefing. They neglect to tell us what
position of the Cosmic Sky those Rays are in the "direction of"
and that is a very important piece of information. Because the
direction of drawing a straight line from Earth to the Great
Attractor which also has the Great Wall and then the Sloan
Great Wall all involved in this one straight line drawn.


Of course this information belittles the Big Bang theory and
places it in jeopardy as being a fake theory.


But scientists need to be more precise and detailed and focused
in their reports. They seem to want to tell us how far away
Centaurus A is from Earth but they never seem to want to say
where in the Cosmic Sky that Centaurus is relative to a straight
line drawn from Earth to the Great Attractor. So that if scientists
had said in this newsflash that Centaurus A was directly on that
Cosmic line of sight to the Great Attractor and Great Wall and
Sloan Great Wall, then they would have made a far better report then
their sloppy report.


Now here I have gathered a partial list of Cosmic Gamma Rays:
--- quoting Wikipedia ---
GRBs of significant historical or scientific importance include:


     * 670702: The first GRB ever detected.[28]
     * 970228: The first GRB with a successfully detected afterglow.
The
location of the afterglow was coincident with a very faint galaxy,
providing strong evidence that GRBs are extragalactic.[29]
     * 970508: The first GRB with a measured redshift (distance). At
z=0.835, it confirmed unambiguously that GRBs are extragalactic.[30]
     * 971214: In 1997, this was believed by some to be the most
energetic event in the universe. This claim has since been
discredited.[31][32]
     * 980425: The first GRB with an observed associated supernova
(1998bw), providing strong evidence of the link between GRBs and
supernovae. The GRB itself was very unusual for being extremely
underluminous. Also the closest GRB to date.[33]
     * 990123: This GRB had the optically brightest afterglow
measured
to date, momentarily reaching or exceeding a magnitude of 8.9, which
would be visible with an ordinary pair of binoculars, despite its
distance of nearly 10 billion light years. This was also the first
GRB
for which optical emission was detected before the gamma-ray
emission
had ceased.[34]
     * 030329A: An extremely close (z=0.168),[35] and therefore
extremely bright GRB, with an unambiguous supernova association.[36]
GRB
030329 was so bright that its gamma radiation ionized the Earth's
upper
atmosphere.[37]
     * 050509B: The first short GRB with a host association.
Provided
evidence that (some) short GRBs, unlike long GRBs, occur in old
galaxies
and do not have accompanying supernovae.[38]
     * 050724: A thoroughly observed short gamma-ray burst with an
afterglow suggesting the demise of a neutron star orbiting a black
hole.[39]
     * 050904: The most distant GRB observed as of 2005, at z=6.29
(13
billion light-years).[40]
     * 060218: A low-redshift GRB with an accompanying supernova.
[41]
     * 060505: The first, well-observed, long duration GRB not
accompanied by a bright supernova.[42]
--- end quoting an encyclopedia ---


Now what I will try to track down is whether any or many of the above
originated from the line of sight of Earth to the Great Attractor.

Postscript: Chapter 18: "pi" and "e" and "i" explained; inverse fine
structure constant, and proton to electron mass ratio, speed of
light, all linked and explained.

Now to get Gravity as the Coulomb interaction of Positron Space to
Electron Matter
of the Observable Universe, I need to get a difference of the photon
of a positron
from the photon of the electron. In the Standard Model, a photon is a
photon is a photon.
That is, never any difference. However, I may have the answer by
saying that the
photon in a positron causes there to be a **different neutrino** than
a photon in a
electron to proton matter interaction. So that gravity is a different
neutrino involved than
when electron to proton matter Coulomb force.

Do you see what I am saying? Probably not. In ordinary matter of
electron to proton the
photons involved would issue a specific type of neutrino to make
gravity in that interaction.
But when a positron to electron interaction occurrs to give gravity,
the photon involved issues
a different neutrino to make the process of gravity work. So that,
consider the Earth Moon
gravity. The gravity that holds Earth together is a proton to electron
ordinary matter and the
photon issues a specific neutrino to carry out gravity. But looking at
the gravity that holds
the Moon to Earth in attraction is created by the positron Spaces of
both Earth and Moon
which cause the photons to issue a different neutrino.

So as Feynman was describing in his Character of Physical Law of a
novel approach to
solving gravity as a force, he was describing a universe awash in
uniform particles. That is
alright if we think of that awash as the predominant neutrinos. But
there are a small number
of "pecular neutrinos" in the wash, the uniform overall general wash
of neutrinos. These
pecular or different neutrinos arose from the Positron Space, that is
interacting with the normal matter which is the electrons of the atom
totality.

In other words, I am making Feynman's gravity work, whereas Feynman
debunked that
mechanism. That mechanism is too good to not be true, or at least a
new look at that
mechanism.

Essentially, what I am doing is recrafting gravity as a force that is
merely a Coulomb Force
and that is originated by the Positron Space upon electron-matter.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Gravity Is Singularity Of Quantum-Continuum.By Aiya-Oba
Next: Ternary formula for a decimal expression