Charge Conservation - Hint of the Day
in [Design]
|
From: Richard Henry on 23 Jul 2010 16:35 On Jul 20, 2:04 pm, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...(a)On-My- Web-Site.com> wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:58:13 -0700, John Larkin > > > > <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:53:22 -0700, Tim Wescott <t...(a)seemywebsite.com> > >wrote: > > >>On 07/20/2010 08:24 AM, Jim Thompson wrote: > >>> Charge Conservation - Hint of the Day: > > >>> How many Coulombs can a 1mH inductor charged to 1A deliver? > > >>That's insufficient information, and I rather expect that you know it. > > >He promised us, a couple of weeks ago, a "mathematical proof" of > >something or other charge related. Is this lame snarky "hint" the best > >he's been able to come up with? > > >John > > Cluck! Cluck! Cluck! Cluck! ESAD! > > I may be a snarky ol' git, but I'm GOOD ;-) > > I'm a graphical/pictorial sort of guy... > > Normally I'd do this sort of thing on a white board, before an > audience at one of my seminars, only an outline in front of me, then > "play" the audience. > > So I've been struggling to create the pictorial on a series of sheets > of paper to properly describe (and solve the issue). > > It's funny, the only time I've had time to think this through has been > while sitting in doctors' waiting rooms. This morning, at > Barnet-Dulaney (wife's eyes, YAG lasers, cataracts), I fitted the > pictorial together in my head. > > Within the next 48 hours you, John "The Bloviator" Larkin (and ALL > your supplicants) are going to be BURNED AT THE STAKE... > > One-by-one every one of your STUPID STUPID STUPID statements will be > refuted (message ID's supplied to prove you made the STUPID STUPID > STUPID statements). > > I'm working now on how to distribute the material so that it can't be > disseminated, so that everyone can have a good laugh... BEHIND YOUR > WORTHLESS BACK ;-) > > RECANT! RECANT! THE END IS NEAR :-) > 48 hours passed yet?
From: John Larkin on 23 Jul 2010 16:37 On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:35:54 -0700 (PDT), Richard Henry <pomerado(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >On Jul 20, 2:04�pm, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...(a)On-My- >Web-Site.com> wrote: >> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:58:13 -0700, John Larkin >> >> >> >> <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >> >On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:53:22 -0700, Tim Wescott <t...(a)seemywebsite.com> >> >wrote: >> >> >>On 07/20/2010 08:24 AM, Jim Thompson wrote: >> >>> Charge Conservation - Hint of the Day: >> >> >>> How many Coulombs can a 1mH inductor charged to 1A deliver? >> >> >>That's insufficient information, and I rather expect that you know it. >> >> >He promised us, a couple of weeks ago, a "mathematical proof" of >> >something or other charge related. Is this lame snarky "hint" the best >> >he's been able to come up with? >> >> >John >> >> Cluck! Cluck! Cluck! Cluck! ESAD! >> >> I may be a snarky ol' git, but I'm GOOD ;-) >> >> I'm a graphical/pictorial sort of guy... >> >> Normally I'd do this sort of thing on a white board, before an >> audience at one of my seminars, only an outline in front of me, then >> "play" the audience. >> >> So I've been struggling to create the pictorial on a series of sheets >> of paper to properly describe (and solve the issue). >> >> It's funny, the only time I've had time to think this through has been >> while sitting in doctors' waiting rooms. �This morning, at >> Barnet-Dulaney (wife's eyes, YAG lasers, cataracts), I fitted the >> pictorial together in my head. >> >> Within the next 48 hours you, John "The Bloviator" Larkin (and ALL >> your supplicants) are going to be BURNED AT THE STAKE... >> >> One-by-one every one of your STUPID STUPID STUPID statements will be >> refuted (message ID's supplied to prove you made the STUPID STUPID >> STUPID statements). >> >> I'm working now on how to distribute the material so that it can't be >> disseminated, so that everyone can have a good laugh... BEHIND YOUR >> WORTHLESS BACK ;-) >> >> RECANT! �RECANT! �THE END IS NEAR :-) >> >48 hours passed yet? He may be a snarky ol' git, but he's SLOW. John
From: Jim Thompson on 23 Jul 2010 18:43 On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:37:45 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:35:54 -0700 (PDT), Richard Henry ><pomerado(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >>On Jul 20, 2:04�pm, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...(a)On-My- >>Web-Site.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:58:13 -0700, John Larkin >>> >>> >>> >>> <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>> >On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:53:22 -0700, Tim Wescott <t...(a)seemywebsite.com> >>> >wrote: >>> >>> >>On 07/20/2010 08:24 AM, Jim Thompson wrote: >>> >>> Charge Conservation - Hint of the Day: >>> >>> >>> How many Coulombs can a 1mH inductor charged to 1A deliver? >>> >>> >>That's insufficient information, and I rather expect that you know it. >>> >>> >He promised us, a couple of weeks ago, a "mathematical proof" of >>> >something or other charge related. Is this lame snarky "hint" the best >>> >he's been able to come up with? >>> >>> >John >>> >>> Cluck! Cluck! Cluck! Cluck! ESAD! >>> >>> I may be a snarky ol' git, but I'm GOOD ;-) >>> >>> I'm a graphical/pictorial sort of guy... >>> >>> Normally I'd do this sort of thing on a white board, before an >>> audience at one of my seminars, only an outline in front of me, then >>> "play" the audience. >>> >>> So I've been struggling to create the pictorial on a series of sheets >>> of paper to properly describe (and solve the issue). >>> >>> It's funny, the only time I've had time to think this through has been >>> while sitting in doctors' waiting rooms. �This morning, at >>> Barnet-Dulaney (wife's eyes, YAG lasers, cataracts), I fitted the >>> pictorial together in my head. >>> >>> Within the next 48 hours you, John "The Bloviator" Larkin (and ALL >>> your supplicants) are going to be BURNED AT THE STAKE... >>> >>> One-by-one every one of your STUPID STUPID STUPID statements will be >>> refuted (message ID's supplied to prove you made the STUPID STUPID >>> STUPID statements). >>> >>> I'm working now on how to distribute the material so that it can't be >>> disseminated, so that everyone can have a good laugh... BEHIND YOUR >>> WORTHLESS BACK ;-) >>> >>> RECANT! �RECANT! �THE END IS NEAR :-) >>> >>48 hours passed yet? > > >He may be a snarky ol' git, but he's SLOW. > >John > > I announced yesterday that I had real ($) work. I'll get there. Do you still maintain what you said in... "From: John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Inverse Marx generator Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 08:50:50 -0700 Message-ID: <3b893612tjjndo8o4v1evro050nonjgp41(a)4ax.com> [snip] Right. If you dump all the energy from one charged cap into another, discharged, cap of a different value, and do it efficiently, charge is not conserved. John" is true ?:-) You can still recant, admit error, and be viewed a gentleman. However I won't hold my breath. Of course every expert in the world disagrees with you... why do you think it's called a LAW? ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | Spice is like a sports car... Only as good as the person behind the wheel.
From: Richard Henry on 24 Jul 2010 23:56 On Jul 20, 8:24 am, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...(a)On-My- Web-Site.com> wrote: > Charge Conservation - Hint of the Day: > > How many Coulombs can a 1mH inductor charged to 1A deliver? I was expecting an actual answer to this in the recently-revealed paper. I guess I was misled.
From: Robert Baer on 25 Jul 2010 04:30
Richard Henry wrote: > On Jul 20, 8:24 am, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...(a)On-My- > Web-Site.com> wrote: >> Charge Conservation - Hint of the Day: >> >> How many Coulombs can a 1mH inductor charged to 1A deliver? > > I was expecting an actual answer to this in the recently-revealed > paper. I guess I was misled. You want an answer already? Go to Radio Shack and make them perform to their ad (and if they don't, sue). |