Chomsky: 92% believe Obama leads the country "toward socialism"
in [SolidWorks]
|
From: Gunner Asch on 27 Apr 2010 06:00 On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:00:55 -0500, "The Whole Truth" <whole(a)wholetruth.foo> wrote: > > >"PrecisionmachinisT" <precisionmachinist(a)notmail.com> wrote in message >news:KMWdnStIgJW080vWnZ2dnUVZ_jidnZ2d(a)scnresearch.com... >> >> "The Whole Truth" <whole(a)wholetruth.foo> wrote in message >> news:4bd66d54$1(a)news.x-privat.org... >>> >>> >>> "PrecisionmachinisT" <precisionmachinist(a)notmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:W-2dnS5A9LlK-kvWnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d(a)scnresearch.com... >>> > >>> > "The Whole Truth" <whole(a)wholetruth.foo> wrote in message >>> > news:4bd66026$1(a)news.x-privat.org... >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> "PrecisionmachinisT" <precisionmachinist(a)notmail.com> wrote in message >>> >> news:gZ6dnf-6r7pxxkvWnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d(a)scnresearch.com... >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > Well since you put it that way, here is a link to the pew research >> poll >>> >> > which is apparently the subject of much of Chomsky's commentary and >>> >> > opinion >>> >> > : http://people-press.org/report/606/trust-in-government >>> >> > >>> >> > The 92% figure is from a New York Times / CBS News poll survey which >>> > only >>> >> > included tea party members as respondants--a group which fewer than >> 20% >>> > of >>> >> > Americans identify themselves as being in support of. >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> Your spin doesn't invalidate the whole truth. >>> > >>> > Except... >>> >>> >>> >>> Yawn, you're boring me, hippy. >>> >>> >> http://www.cafepress.com/cp/moredetails.aspx?showBleed=false&ProductNo=40247 >> 3881&colorNo=0&pr=F >>> >> >> Oh, I see. >> >> It's safe to bet that you never placed on the debate team.... > >That's for fags. I guess you were a master debater. Nah..he was out in the parking lot getting stoned wth the rest of the foolish. Gunner
From: Gunner Asch on 27 Apr 2010 06:01 On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:43:23 -0800, "PrecisionmachinisT" <precisionmachinist(a)notmail.com> wrote: > >"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >news:hr5pb2$qno$2(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:30:05 -0800, Uhh Clem wrote: >> >> >>> Which gets us back to the fundamental issue--Whereas liberals are open >> >>> to change, conservatives are opposed to it. >> >> >> >> Dude, we are totally on board with change. Watch this November. >> > >> > http://journals.democraticunderground.com/NanceGreggs/572 Posted by >> > NanceGreggs in General Discussion: Presidency Sat Apr 24th 2010, 07:38 >PM >> > >> > Despite what may seem to be overwhelming evidence to the contrary, not >all >> > of my countrymen are bigoted, homophobic, whackjobs. Really. >> >> Exactly. Some of us are Conservatives. >> > >Oh, now I see. > >It's safe to bet that you never placed on the debate team.... Actually..I was on the debating team. And we won the league that year. Gunner
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 27 Apr 2010 17:14 On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:43:23 -0800, PrecisionmachinisT wrote: > > "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > news:hr5pb2$qno$2(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:30:05 -0800, Uhh Clem wrote: >> >> >>> Which gets us back to the fundamental issue--Whereas liberals are >> >>> open to change, conservatives are opposed to it. >> >> >> >> Dude, we are totally on board with change. Watch this November. >> > >> > http://journals.democraticunderground.com/NanceGreggs/572 Posted by >> > NanceGreggs in General Discussion: Presidency Sat Apr 24th 2010, 07:38 > PM >> > >> > Despite what may seem to be overwhelming evidence to the contrary, not > all >> > of my countrymen are bigoted, homophobic, whackjobs. Really. >> >> Exactly. Some of us are Conservatives. >> >> > Oh, now I see. > > It's safe to bet that you never placed on the debate team.... On the contrary. I was the captain.
From: Uhh Clem on 27 Apr 2010 18:54 "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message news:hr7k4h$si2$2(a)news.eternal-september.org... > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:43:23 -0800, PrecisionmachinisT wrote: > >> >> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >> news:hr5pb2$qno$2(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:30:05 -0800, Uhh Clem wrote: >>> >>> >>> Which gets us back to the fundamental issue--Whereas liberals are >>> >>> open to change, conservatives are opposed to it. >>> >> >>> >> Dude, we are totally on board with change. Watch this November. >>> > >>> > http://journals.democraticunderground.com/NanceGreggs/572 Posted by >>> > NanceGreggs in General Discussion: Presidency Sat Apr 24th 2010, 07:38 >> PM >>> > >>> > Despite what may seem to be overwhelming evidence to the contrary, not >> all >>> > of my countrymen are bigoted, homophobic, whackjobs. Really. >>> >>> Exactly. Some of us are Conservatives. >>> >>> >> Oh, now I see. >> >> It's safe to bet that you never placed on the debate team.... > > On the contrary. I was the captain. > Prove it. --
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 27 Apr 2010 19:57
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:54:39 -0800, Uhh Clem wrote: > > "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > news:hr7k4h$si2$2(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:43:23 -0800, PrecisionmachinisT wrote: >> >> >>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>> news:hr5pb2$qno$2(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:30:05 -0800, Uhh Clem wrote: >>>> >>>> >>> Which gets us back to the fundamental issue--Whereas liberals are >>>> >>> open to change, conservatives are opposed to it. >>>> >> >>>> >> Dude, we are totally on board with change. Watch this November. >>>> > >>>> > http://journals.democraticunderground.com/NanceGreggs/572 Posted by >>>> > NanceGreggs in General Discussion: Presidency Sat Apr 24th 2010, >>>> > 07:38 >>> PM >>>> > >>>> > Despite what may seem to be overwhelming evidence to the contrary, >>>> > not >>> all >>>> > of my countrymen are bigoted, homophobic, whackjobs. Really. >>>> >>>> Exactly. Some of us are Conservatives. >>>> >>>> >>> Oh, now I see. >>> >>> It's safe to bet that you never placed on the debate team.... >> >> On the contrary. I was the captain. >> >> > Prove it. Prove I wasn't. |