From: Johnw on
occam formulated the question :
> I suspect you do not have SRWare Iron installed. Its extensions list is
> quite distinct to the usual Chrome extensions. (But see reply from
> Vanguard LH)
> I am only interested in one version (of Chrome), just to get the hang of
> it.

All you had to do was click on the spanner.

http://img28.imageshack.us/img28/9137/srware.gif

The link above has an image that shows you how.



--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: occam on
On 07/07/2010 16:13, Johnw wrote:
> occam formulated the question :
>> I suspect you do not have SRWare Iron installed. Its extensions list is
>> quite distinct to the usual Chrome extensions. (But see reply from
>> Vanguard LH)
>> I am only interested in one version (of Chrome), just to get the hang of
>> it.
>
> All you had to do was click on the spanner.
>
> http://img28.imageshack.us/img28/9137/srware.gif
>
> The link above has an image that shows you how.
>
>

I did. I then clicked the next invitation to 'get more extensions'
and here is where I ended up.
http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/6182/screen2nu.jpg

This is NOT the usual collection of Chrome extensions. It is a sub-set.
Compare it with the 'normal' Chrome extension set.
From: Johnw on
After serious thinking occam wrote :

> I did. I then clicked the next invitation to 'get more extensions'
> and here is where I ended up.
> http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/6182/screen2nu.jpg

I was corresponding to your coment > "Unfortunately I do not see
Adblocker in the list. Hope it shows up soon"

Maybe AdBlock & Adblocker are 2 different things, but I took it as a
typo.

http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/6820/srware2.gif

I have version 5.0.381 SRWare Iron installed.



--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: pooky on
occam <occam(a)127.0.0.1> wrote in
news:i157t4$3pl$1(a)news.eternal-september.org:

> On 08/07/2010 14:55, pooky wrote:
>>
>> This one should work...either the new one or the older version
>> http://www.chromeextensions.org/appearance-
functioning/adblock/
>
> Thanks pooky, however I have a feeling there is a good reason
why
> the extensions on the SRWare Iron site are a selected sub-set
of
> those of the chromeextensions.org (to reflect the mods in
SRWare
> Iron?). I would prefer to find out the reason, before I install
> any extensions not on the SRWare site.
>
It works fine in the latest version of Iron, but as you wish.
From: Johnw on
occam brought next idea :

> Is it possible you got them from a different source, and it so happend
> to be compatible?

The penny has dropped occam, I have been using it so long on every
version of Chrome/Iron etc, I have lost count of the years.
https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/gighmmpiobklfepjocnamgkkbiglidom

You can have as many browsers as you like installed ( refer my
screenshot ) just a matter of choosing what you want as default.
They all have programs available, which you can install & if you don't
like uninstall.
http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/2016/mybrowsersthatiamtrying.gif

Are you getting ad's on SRWare Iron?
You should'nt be.

SRWare Iron adblocking
http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=SRWare+Iron+adblocking&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&gs_upl=6013%2C614%2C11%2C6%2C428%2C611%2C3%3A6%2C3%2C2
http://www.downloadsquad.com/2009/01/06/block-ads-in-chrome-based-srware-iron-with-a-single-file/
SRWare Iron uses Fanboy's list.
http://www.srware.net/downloads/adblock.ini
http://www.fanboy.co.nz/adblock/iron/

24.06.2010: New Iron-Release: 5.0.381 Final for Windows
http://www.srware.net/en/software_srware_iron_news.php
We released Iron 5.0.381 now, which brings some nice improvements since
Iron 5.0.381 like better stability and an improved adblocker.
The changelog in detail:
- much more stable than Iron 5.0.380
- improved website-compatibility
- improved adblocker ( no more placeholder-errors at some ads)
- better language support Versions for f�r Mac/Linux will follow.



--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---