Cisco 2950 Switch VLAN Config
in [Cisco]
|
Prev: PIX VPN
Next: snmp monitoring
From: RG on 1 Jun 2010 09:37 Can you have an untagged vlans on this switch and how do you define it? Thanks in advanced
From: Doug McIntyre on 1 Jun 2010 10:52 "RG" <nobody(a)nowhere.com> writes: >Can you have an untagged vlans on this switch and how do you define it? >Thanks in advanced Yes, pretty much all of Cisco's switches support VLAN'ing.. If you mean put a port into access mode.. interface FastE 0/1 switchport mode access switchport access vlan 403
From: RG on 1 Jun 2010 13:02 Yes. Wouldn't this mean that the switch's port fa0/1 sends and receives packets that only contain vlan id 403 tag and no others vlans. What I am looking for is in addition to this... interface FastE 0/2 some untagged definition of vlan 403 and interface FastE 0/3 default vlan where fa0/2 could communicate with fa0/1 and fa0/3. In other words, packets will not contain vlan id tag when being transmitted. Thanks for your help. "Doug McIntyre" <merlyn(a)geeks.org> wrote in message news:4c051ec1$0$50147$8046368a(a)newsreader.iphouse.net... > "RG" <nobody(a)nowhere.com> writes: >>Can you have an untagged vlans on this switch and how do you define it? >>Thanks in advanced > > Yes, pretty much all of Cisco's switches support VLAN'ing.. > > > If you mean put a port into access mode.. > > interface FastE 0/1 > switchport mode access > switchport access vlan 403
From: Lukas Schratz on 1 Jun 2010 13:41 * RG hackte in den Rechenknecht: > Can you have an untagged vlans on this switch and how do you define it? > > Thanks in advanced > As untagged vs. tagged traffic is only important if you trunk it somewhere else, you should change the native vlan of that trunk to whatever you want. Traffic from the native vlan is untagged and only possible if you use dot1q. > luke -- Es gibt im Universum keine größere bekannte Kraft als die, welche auf unfertige Software wirkt, um sie in die große weite Welt auszuliefern. Auf Platz zwei ist die Kraft, die Frisbee-Scheiben unter Autos oder an andere unzugängliche Stellen trägt. --FvL in dasr
From: RG on 1 Jun 2010 15:11
Great. Now that you mention trunking... I would like to put 2621 router between the vlans I mentioned. Based on what you are saying this should work. Can I trunk more than one vlan on the same port and how would I do it? Thanks again for your help "Lukas Schratz" <lukas.schratz(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:1btfd7-i54.ln1(a)universe.schratz.at... >* RG hackte in den Rechenknecht: >> Can you have an untagged vlans on this switch and how do you define it? >> >> Thanks in advanced >> > As untagged vs. tagged traffic is only important if you trunk it > somewhere else, you should change the native vlan of that trunk to > whatever you want. Traffic from the native vlan is untagged and only > possible if you use dot1q. >> > > luke > -- > Es gibt im Universum keine gr��ere bekannte Kraft als die, welche auf > unfertige Software wirkt, um sie in die gro�e weite Welt auszuliefern. > Auf Platz zwei ist die Kraft, die Frisbee-Scheiben unter Autos oder an > andere unzug�ngliche Stellen tr�gt. --FvL in dasr |