From: Uli Link on
Marco Buchholz schrieb:

> i´ll test a different driver first. I also read about problems, with
> private ip-ranges like 10.x.x.x (that i get from my provider), but the
> vpn-client works with win-xp.
>

Hi Marco,

you should try with the transparent tunneling set to IPsec over TCP and
configure the VPN gateway accordingly.
It's not unusual that providers don't support NAT-T IPsec over udp/4500.
It's worth to to give it a shot.

--
ULi
From: Marco Buchholz on
Am 07.05.2010 15:40, schrieb Uli Link:
> Marco Buchholz schrieb:
>
>> i´ll test a different driver first. I also read about problems, with
>> private ip-ranges like 10.x.x.x (that i get from my provider), but the
>> vpn-client works with win-xp.
>>
>
> Hi Marco,
>
> you should try with the transparent tunneling set to IPsec over TCP and
> configure the VPN gateway accordingly.
> It's not unusual that providers don't support NAT-T IPsec over udp/4500.
> It's worth to to give it a shot.
>

Hi Uli,

i´ll try to reconfigure the gateway for this test, but i wonder why the
connection works fine on win-xp.

Thanks for your help!
From: Marco Buchholz on
Am 10.05.2010 15:57, schrieb Marco Buchholz:
> Am 07.05.2010 15:40, schrieb Uli Link:
>> Marco Buchholz schrieb:
>>
>>> i´ll test a different driver first. I also read about problems, with
>>> private ip-ranges like 10.x.x.x (that i get from my provider), but the
>>> vpn-client works with win-xp.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Marco,
>>
>> you should try with the transparent tunneling set to IPsec over TCP and
>> configure the VPN gateway accordingly.
>> It's not unusual that providers don't support NAT-T IPsec over udp/4500.
>> It's worth to to give it a shot.
>>
>
> Hi Uli,
>
> i´ll try to reconfigure the gateway for this test, but i wonder why the
> connection works fine on win-xp.
>
> Thanks for your help!

Hello,

i found the reason for this problem. The cisco vpn client does not
support WWAN devices on Windows 7.

It´s described here:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/vpn_client/cisco_vpn_client/vpn_client5006/release/notes/vpnclient5006.html

I guess i have to wait for a new client-version, that supports this feature.

From: alexd on
On 26/05/10 07:38, Marco Buchholz wrote:

> I guess i have to wait for a new client-version, that supports this
> feature.

Have you tried the shrew.net client?

--
<http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) (UnSoEsNpEaTm(a)ale.cx)
21:24:33 up 28 days, 22:02, 0 users, load average: 0.09, 1.20, 1.06
It is better to have been wasted and then sober
than to never have been wasted at all