From: Uli Link on 7 May 2010 09:40 Marco Buchholz schrieb: > i´ll test a different driver first. I also read about problems, with > private ip-ranges like 10.x.x.x (that i get from my provider), but the > vpn-client works with win-xp. > Hi Marco, you should try with the transparent tunneling set to IPsec over TCP and configure the VPN gateway accordingly. It's not unusual that providers don't support NAT-T IPsec over udp/4500. It's worth to to give it a shot. -- ULi
From: Marco Buchholz on 10 May 2010 09:57 Am 07.05.2010 15:40, schrieb Uli Link: > Marco Buchholz schrieb: > >> i´ll test a different driver first. I also read about problems, with >> private ip-ranges like 10.x.x.x (that i get from my provider), but the >> vpn-client works with win-xp. >> > > Hi Marco, > > you should try with the transparent tunneling set to IPsec over TCP and > configure the VPN gateway accordingly. > It's not unusual that providers don't support NAT-T IPsec over udp/4500. > It's worth to to give it a shot. > Hi Uli, i´ll try to reconfigure the gateway for this test, but i wonder why the connection works fine on win-xp. Thanks for your help!
From: Marco Buchholz on 26 May 2010 02:38 Am 10.05.2010 15:57, schrieb Marco Buchholz: > Am 07.05.2010 15:40, schrieb Uli Link: >> Marco Buchholz schrieb: >> >>> i´ll test a different driver first. I also read about problems, with >>> private ip-ranges like 10.x.x.x (that i get from my provider), but the >>> vpn-client works with win-xp. >>> >> >> Hi Marco, >> >> you should try with the transparent tunneling set to IPsec over TCP and >> configure the VPN gateway accordingly. >> It's not unusual that providers don't support NAT-T IPsec over udp/4500. >> It's worth to to give it a shot. >> > > Hi Uli, > > i´ll try to reconfigure the gateway for this test, but i wonder why the > connection works fine on win-xp. > > Thanks for your help! Hello, i found the reason for this problem. The cisco vpn client does not support WWAN devices on Windows 7. It´s described here: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/vpn_client/cisco_vpn_client/vpn_client5006/release/notes/vpnclient5006.html I guess i have to wait for a new client-version, that supports this feature.
From: alexd on 26 May 2010 16:24 On 26/05/10 07:38, Marco Buchholz wrote: > I guess i have to wait for a new client-version, that supports this > feature. Have you tried the shrew.net client? -- <http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) (UnSoEsNpEaTm(a)ale.cx) 21:24:33 up 28 days, 22:02, 0 users, load average: 0.09, 1.20, 1.06 It is better to have been wasted and then sober than to never have been wasted at all
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Need a VPN cookbook for 871W router Next: Cisco Aironet 1200 Access Point: Newer firmware? |