Prev: Quantum states controlled in silicon
Next: Antineutrinos and their antiparticles differ in mass
From: Bruce Richmond on 25 Jun 2010 19:52
On Jun 25, 3:49 pm, "erschroedin...(a)gmail.com"
<erschroedin...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 25, 12:23 pm, AM <sctu...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > hersheyh wrote:
> > > there is lower turnout in the U.S. is largely because we require
> > > voters to undergo more hoops and intentionally make it harder for
> > > certain groups (typically the poor and workers) to vote.
>
> > What by making sure people show proper ID ?
>
> > No problem getting that if you want, and you are a LEGAL citizen.
> > (costs $10 on average for ID, more for drivers license)
>
> > Please tell how we make it hard for workers to vote.
>
> > --
> > AM
>
> How does an 80-year old person, who was born at home (and so has no
> birth certificate), and has never had a driver's license, get an ID?

Did they ever work? File with the IRS or SS? Were they ever included
in a census report? Seriously I have never heard of anyone around
here having a problem, and I know some folks in their 80s that were
born at home.
From: bert on 25 Jun 2010 20:06
On Jun 25, 7:52 pm, Bruce Richmond <bsr3...(a)my-deja.com> wrote:
> On Jun 25, 3:49 pm, "erschroedin...(a)gmail.com"
>
>
>
>
>
> <erschroedin...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jun 25, 12:23 pm, AM <sctu...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > > hersheyh wrote:
> > > > there is lower turnout in the U.S. is largely because we require
> > > > voters to undergo more hoops and intentionally make it harder for
> > > > certain groups (typically the poor and workers) to vote.
>
> > > What by making sure people show proper ID ?
>
> > > No problem getting that if you want, and you are a LEGAL citizen.
> > > (costs $10 on average for ID, more for drivers license)
>
> > > Please tell how we make it hard for workers to vote.
>
> > > --
> > > AM
>
> > How does an 80-year old person, who was born at home (and so has no
> > birth certificate), and has never had a driver's license, get an ID?
>
> Did they ever work?  File with the IRS or SS?  Were they ever included
> in a census report?  Seriously I have never heard of anyone around
> here having a problem, and I know some folks in their 80s that were
> born at home.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Relating climate change,and not relating it to global warming is a
crime in this spacetime. Do nothing and the children in the future
will be in jeapody. Same as our national dept getting completely out
of control. Best we clean up our act. Jefferson said moons ago to the
public. "don't die owing money" Get the picture TreBert
From: Cassidy Furlong on 26 Jun 2010 18:05
I don't currently drive, but I support the payment
of a fee for a Driver's License "ID," because I may want to drive,
anyway, at some time, by (say) renting a van (or two Segways,
chained-together .-)

anyway, a Voting Rights Act provision (Section 5,
the Preclearance Rule) was removed in 2000 --
just in time for Gore to blow both of his feet, off, in electoral
collegiate terms;
then, they renewed the Act (and the Dems actually brought an amendment
to the floor, voted-down, to extend the rule to all states &
counties)!!

> an ID is required.

thus&so:
you have given a condition of sufficiency,
that words typed aroundhereinat could have been a trigger, but
what will show a neccesity, that any one grokked a theorem
of Arivaderci Petroleum?

>  Mason's abc theorem may be viewed as a very special instance of a
>  Wronskian estimate:  in Lang's proof,

thus&so:
are not dilation of time and length (in the direction
of time-travellin' (sik), directly porportional?

thus&so:
how many of us'd ever understood a proof of the unfinity of the
primes?... well,
if not, we'll never get p-adic numbers, or AP-didactical ones,
either. anyway,
p-adics are cool, when subsumed in Galois theory (or vise-versa .-)

thus&so:
well, there's phi of me to one o'you; go figure!

--the duke of oil!
Rationale. In addition to political, economic, and mechanical
feasibility, one must consider the environmental consequences of
choosing ethanol over gasoline. In par- ticular, the amount of air
pollution released in the form of CO2 and other green house gases
(GHGs) is a crucial point of interest. In order to model the
difference in ethanol and gasoline emissions, it is necessary to
calculate the final mass of GHGs (in the case where 10% of the
gasoline energy supply has been replaced by ethanol) minus the ini-
tial mass (before the 10% replacement was implemented). If the result
is negative, the 10% ethanol scenario gives off fewer GHGs; if it is
positive, it gives off more.
Assumptions and calculations. Our model is based on the following
assump- tions:
1.
Itisassumedthatnearlyallofthegasolinerequiredfortheproductionofethanol
is used in the farming and harvesting stage, while other energy
sources (i.e., coal)
http://www.maa.org/pubs/cmj47.pdf
http://tarpley.net/online-books/george-bush-the-unauthorized-biography/chapter-8-the-permian-basin-gang/
From: Bruce Richmond on 26 Jun 2010 20:52
On Jun 25, 11:05 am, hersheyh <hershe...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 24, 11:02 pm, Bruce Richmond <bsr3...(a)my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 24, 10:07 pm, Sam <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Climate change sceptics are less 'credible' scientists, finds survey
> > > Though researchers question the methods of the studyhttp://physicsworld.com/cws/m/1773/17632/article/news/43002
>
> > "Indeed, Whitmarsh points out that the survey excludes the 26% of
> > researchers who are neither convinced nor unconvinced by the ACC
> > arguments."
>
> > ?????  Does that mean they don't think it is worth their time to
> > consider ACC?
>
> Pretty much.  One should never underestimate the extent to which most
> people are busy with their own lives and ignore or are uninterested in
> things outside that.  That is why there are "undecideds" up till
> voting day even when there is a large policy difference between
> candidates and why voting is not 100%.  Of course, the reason why
> there is lower turnout in the U.S. is largely because we require
> voters to undergo more hoops and intentionally make it harder for
> certain groups (typically the poor and workers) to vote.

BTW, nice job of hijacking the thread.
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Quantum states controlled in silicon
Next: Antineutrinos and their antiparticles differ in mass