Prev: Dear Friend! I am a manager of Nigerian gold mine, and I have some cash I'd like to transfer out of Nigeria. Would you kindly provide me with your banking information? You'll be generously paid for your help.
Next: EINSTEIN WAS totally wrong - SPACE AND TIME do not BEND
From: johnson542 on 14 Jun 2010 13:17 For a positive integer n, define T_n: Z^+ --> R by T_n(x)= (2^n * x - 1)/3. It is easy to see that Collatz Conjecture is true iff every odd positive integer is equal to A:= T_(n_k)...T_(n_2)T_(n_1) (1) for some n_1, ... , n_k in Z^+. A is an integer only for appropiate (n_1,...,n_k). Has anyone characterized such k-tuples?
From: TCL on 20 Jun 2010 13:06
On Jun 14, 5:17 pm, johnson542 <johnson...(a)verizon.net> wrote: > For a positive integer n, define T_n: Z^+ --> R by > > T_n(x)= (2^n * x - 1)/3. > > It is easy to see that Collatz Conjecture is true iff every > odd positive integer is equal to > > A:= T_(n_k)...T_(n_2)T_(n_1) (1) > > for some n_1, ... , n_k in Z^+. > > A is an integer only for appropiate (n_1,...,n_k). > > Has anyone characterized such k-tuples? I have been able to do it for k=1,2,3,4,5. (1 and 2 cases are easy). I am trying to do it now for general k. Don't know if this (the general k case) has been done by someone before. -TCL |