Prev: rewrite of #172; Dirac's new radioactivities Chapt 5 #173; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: DVD RECORDER
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 19 Jun 2010 01:54


Androcles wrote:
> "Owen Jacobson" <angrybaldguy(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:2010061900210633875-angrybaldguy(a)gmailcom...
> | On 2010-06-18 02:37:18 -0400, Archimedes Plutonium said:
> |
> | > The I have experiment (B) where I take a given quantity of Earth
> | > simulated ocean water and another sample of a simulated Comet water
> |
> | Ocean water is easy, but how do you propose to simulate comet water?
> |
> | -o
>
> Buy a fridge from here:
> http://www.comet.co.uk/shopcomet/homePage.do?zone_id=13

Well the experiment would have to run through a bombardment test
of protons on ice water versus liquid water in that ice water may
cause
the higher ratio of heavy water formation. I saw no reports of
Antarctica having
a higher density of heavy water compared to liquid ocean water. But
would
have to rule this out.

I am guessing that astronomers know the salinity of Comet water with
some
high degree of accuracy. So what I am guessing the reason that Comet
water is 2X more heavy water than Earth water is that both are created
via
Dirac new radioactivities additive creation, but that the Cosmic Rays
(protons)
end up on Earth into making more heavy salt rather than heavy water
since
chlorine has two stable isotopes of CL35 and CL37.

I have not yet confirmed whether astronomers know what the salt
density
in Comets is? My suspicion is that these equations are true:

Earth water + cosmic rays = 160ppm heavy water + 1/4 more CL37 density
than Comet

Comet water + cosmic rays = 320ppm heavy water + miniscule CL37
density increase

Of course, Earth is bombarded with more cosmic rays than a comet.

In summary, the cosmic rays as additive creation Dirac's new
radioactivities causes
Earth water to use more of the protons in creating heavy salt whereas
in Comets
those protons go to making 2X more heavy water than Earth.

This is what the experiment hopes to verify. And if it does so, would
be substantial
proof that Dirac's new radioactivities additive creation is true.

And it leaves the field of astro chemistry wide open to explore other
chemicals on
planets or moons and their density disparity. Why does Earth have
a larger iron density than Mars or Venus? Is it because the larger
magnetic field of
Earth brings in more Cosmic rays than normally.


Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: rewrite of #172; Dirac's new radioactivities Chapt 5 #173; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: DVD RECORDER