Commenting On Unused Equipment
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: -hh on 29 Oct 2009 20:32 John Navas <spamfilt...(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > -hh <recscuba_goo...(a)huntzinger.com> wrote in > <22edd4d0-9d3c-48ea-b09c-aae137b9e...(a)g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>: > > >For example, John Navas denying that a $399 cited post for a specific > >camera's retail price doesn't adequately validate a claim of "Starting > >at $400..." ... > > Does it smart so much to have your silly and misleading claim exposed > for what it is? I provided citations for my claim, of which absolutely *none* were proven wrong. On the other hand, you claimed that B&H's price was $499, which was proven to be incorrect (over $50 higher than actual). Simply more proof that John Navas doesn't tire of lying. -hh
From: Bob Larter on 29 Oct 2009 21:33 Bob Larter is Lionel Lauer - Look it up wrote: > On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:02:20 +1100, Bob Larter <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Bob Larter is Lionel Lauer - Look it up wrote: >>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:51:54 +1100, Bob Larter <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Curiouser and Curiouser wrote: >>>>> I sometimes wonder why people feel the ne[*Yawn!*] >>> >>> >>> see: alt.kooks.lionel-lauer >>> >>> A valid group in the known net-trolls groups. >> Really? - I don't know any servers that carry it. ;^) > > Huh. I guess that's what you get for living in backwards backwoods > last-century-mentality Australia. > > alt.kooks.lionel-lauer > > I instantly found it on 4 main servers this side of the world. Posts going > back all the way to 2005 (as far as I found still retained). I guess they > like to use it to keep tabs on your trolling-tracks of disaster across the > globe. A public service to out your troll's history everywhere you go, no > matter what name you use. > > Not intending to go off-topic or anything (the main reason his own > newsgroup was created for him), but I thought the Bob Larter troll should > know how well he's been globally outted. His posts are quite amusing to the > more advanced sectors of civilization. Amusing, of course, in a way that > he's totally unaware of. I hate to disappoint you, but all the regulars in this group already know who I am. -- W . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
From: nospam on 29 Oct 2009 20:33 In article <4dake5lkho3ql48enp2fks9ijk1rhrkp12(a)4ax.com>, John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > >For example, John Navas denying that a $399 cited post for a specific > >camera's retail price doesn't adequately validate a claim of "Starting > >at $400..." ... > > Does it smart so much to have your silly and misleading claim exposed > for what it is? many of your claims have been exposed as either misleading or completely false. you tell us, does it smart?
From: Bob Larter on 29 Oct 2009 21:37 tony cooper wrote: > On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:13:32 -0400, John A. <john(a)nowhere.invalid> > wrote: > >> Anyone know a good psychologist or FBI profiler willing to look over >> his posts and share some insights? Might be entertaining. :) > > You can't help but form some impressions about him. He's not > unintelligent. His writing style and subject matter indicates that > he's intelligent enough to be articulate and intelligent enough to do > research on subject matter. > > Most probably a victim of some form of autism with a helping of idiot > savant. The repetition in his posts and posting style point to the > autism. He needs to feel things are in proper order, writes something > that he feels is right, and then repeats and repeats and repeats that > same thing. > > Like idiot savants, he has a splinter skill. His is becoming very > familiar with one technical subject area. This indicates high > right-side brain development. > > His inability to demonstrate any applied skill in photography despite > a knowledge of the technical side of cameras and photography says that > he's fulfilled in knowing the subject matter but has no interest in > actually doing photography. Photography isn't his goal; knowing the > subject area is. Because actually taking photographs doesn't interest > him, he denigrates those who do because he considers that skill to be > unimportant. > > The lack of social skills is further indication of the idiot savant > manifestation in autism. He understands that he has no social skills > and, to avoid rejection, he pushes people away with his abuse. It's a > "You can't reject me because I've already rejected you" thing. > > You won't get him out of the newsgroup. He needs it. He's unable to > form normal social relationships so he's made this his social > relationship, and - unlike in his outside life - he can control this > relationship. He feels that people must pay attention to him here. > > The bit about retiring at 25 is probably a reference to the age when > he came to grips with the fact that he wasn't going to be able to > function in a normal environment and hold a job. The references to > treks in the desert and in swamps are fantasies about how his life > would have been if he was normal. > > That's my theory, anyway. <nods> I think that you're pretty much on the money there. -- W . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
From: John Navas on 29 Oct 2009 20:46
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:33:11 +1100, Bob Larter <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> wrote in <4aea3447$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au>: >Bob Larter is Lionel Lauer - Look it up wrote: >> Not intending to go off-topic or anything (the main reason his own >> newsgroup was created for him), but I thought the Bob Larter troll should >> know how well he's been globally outted. His posts are quite amusing to the >> more advanced sectors of civilization. Amusing, of course, in a way that >> he's totally unaware of. > >I hate to disappoint you, but all the regulars in this group already >know who I am. Who is that, and how do we know? -- Best regards, John Buying a dSLR doesn't make you a photographer, it makes you a dSLR owner. "The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it." -Ansel Adams |