From: Alvaro Herrera on 25 Nov 2008 10:23 Fujii Masao escribi�: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvherre(a)commandprompt.com> wrote: > > Dickson S. Guedes escribi�: > >> Fujii Masao escreveu: > >>> (...) > >>>> Even if we need to have the database in real, I'd like to use another > >>>> name for it. The name 'walsender' seems to be an internal module name > >>>> but it should be a feature name (ex. 'replication'). > >>>> > >>> > >>> Agreed. The name 'replication' is more suitable, I also think. > >>> Any other ideas? > >> > >> 'walsender' should be a schema in the 'replication' database. Other > >> modules, in replication feature, could be placed there too. > > > > Hmm, what is this database there for? > > It's for authentication for replication. This was discussed before. > Please see the following thread and feel free to comment. > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-11/msg00187.php Hmm ... I think this means that the suggestion by Dickson does not make much sense, right? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: "Fujii Masao" on 25 Nov 2008 11:40 On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(a)commandprompt.com> wrote: > Fujii Masao escribió: >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera >> <alvherre(a)commandprompt.com> wrote: >> > Dickson S. Guedes escribió: >> >> Fujii Masao escreveu: >> >>> (...) >> >>>> Even if we need to have the database in real, I'd like to use another >> >>>> name for it. The name 'walsender' seems to be an internal module name >> >>>> but it should be a feature name (ex. 'replication'). >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> Agreed. The name 'replication' is more suitable, I also think. >> >>> Any other ideas? >> >> >> >> 'walsender' should be a schema in the 'replication' database. Other >> >> modules, in replication feature, could be placed there too. >> > >> > Hmm, what is this database there for? >> >> It's for authentication for replication. This was discussed before. >> Please see the following thread and feel free to comment. >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-11/msg00187.php > > Hmm ... I think this means that the suggestion by Dickson does not make > much sense, right? Oh, I'm sorry! -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Heikki Linnakangas on 25 Nov 2008 13:12 Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Fujii Masao escribi�: >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera >> <alvherre(a)commandprompt.com> wrote: >>> Dickson S. Guedes escribi�: >>>> Fujii Masao escreveu: >>>>> (...) >>>>>> Even if we need to have the database in real, I'd like to use another >>>>>> name for it. The name 'walsender' seems to be an internal module name >>>>>> but it should be a feature name (ex. 'replication'). >>>>>> >>>>> Agreed. The name 'replication' is more suitable, I also think. >>>>> Any other ideas? >>>> 'walsender' should be a schema in the 'replication' database. Other >>>> modules, in replication feature, could be placed there too. >>> Hmm, what is this database there for? >> It's for authentication for replication. This was discussed before. >> Please see the following thread and feel free to comment. >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-11/msg00187.php > > Hmm ... I think this means that the suggestion by Dickson does not make > much sense, right? Right. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: David Fetter on 26 Nov 2008 14:00 On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:23:45PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Fujii Masao escribi�: > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera > > <alvherre(a)commandprompt.com> wrote: > > > Dickson S. Guedes escribi�: > > >> Fujii Masao escreveu: > > >>> (...) > > >>>> Even if we need to have the database in real, I'd like to use > > >>>> another name for it. The name 'walsender' seems to be an > > >>>> internal module name but it should be a feature name (ex. > > >>>> 'replication'). > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> Agreed. The name 'replication' is more suitable, I also think. > > >>> Any other ideas? > > >> > > >> 'walsender' should be a schema in the 'replication' database. > > >> Other modules, in replication feature, could be placed there > > >> too. > > > > > > Hmm, what is this database there for? > > > > It's for authentication for replication. This was discussed > > before. Please see the following thread and feel free to comment. > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-11/msg00187.php > > Hmm ... I think this means that the suggestion by Dickson does not > make much sense, right? It sounds to me like this should use SQL/MED connections, if it's holding auth information :) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <david(a)fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter(a)gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Heikki Linnakangas on 26 Nov 2008 14:15 David Fetter wrote: > It sounds to me like this should use SQL/MED connections, if it's > holding auth information :) No, the SQL/MED stuff holds authentication information to authenticate to other data sources. This is about authentication of *incoming* connections. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: ERROR: incompatible library Next: combined indexes with Gist - planner issues? |