Prev: powerpc: Use IRQF_NO_SUSPEND not IRQF_TIMER for non-timer interrupts
Next: [PATCH 3/9] staging: otus: check kmalloc() return value
From: Bojan Smojver on 5 Aug 2010 03:00 On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 08:26 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Why do it in kernel? s2disk should already be faster... Because LZO support is already there, the patch is straightforward and not everyone wants to set up userspace tools to hibernate? If we are relying on s2disk as the only solution, then in-kernel hibernation should be removed. If not, I don't see why in-kernel hibernation should suck that much, when we can make it suck less. -- Bojan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |