From: Psycho-billy on 15 Nov 2008 14:43 Steve, I've run into a similar problem (quoting your article): WARNING #1: When you enable ICS, the network adapter connected to the local area network is assigned a static IP address of 192.168.0.1. The client computers are assigned other IP addresses in the 192.168.0.x range. These addresses may not be compatible with an existing network What seems to be happening is that enabling ICS wants to assign the 192.168.0.1 address to the wireless card connected to the DSL gateway, which already has that address. Do you know of any way to make this work? I have networked a W2K Pro machine with my XP machine (the host) using a crossover Ethernet cable (this actually seems to work better without the crossover cable???), but have so far failed with static addresses on both machines, bridging, etc. Also thinking about trying to network with a router, but it would have to have RJ45 ports and a way to connect to the DSL gateway wirelessly. Let me know what you think. Regards, Larry Marquardt -- PB "Steve Winograd" wrote: > On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:24:03 -0700 (PDT), david2tm > <david2tm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >Hello... > >I've WinXP Pro SP3 PC > >It have 2 LAN cards and one "internal pci" aDSL modem (a WAN > >connection) > > > >I want to share that connection with these 2 LAN "outputs", and, if I > >can, be able set which of these outputs gets more traffic priority... > > > >How can I do that? > > Create a network bridge between the network connections for the two > LAN cards. Enable ICS on the aDSL modem connection. If it asks what > to use for the home network connection, tell it to use the network > bridge. I've written a web site with details: > > Windows XP Internet Connection Sharing > http://www.practicallynetworked.com/sharing/xp_ics > > I don't know of a way to set traffic priority. > -- > Best Wishes, > Steve Winograd, MS-MVP (Windows Networking) > > Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group > for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions > addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups. > > Microsoft Most Valuable Professional Program > http://mvp.support.microsoft.com >
From: James Egan on 15 Nov 2008 16:14 On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:43:01 -0800, Psycho-billy <Psychobilly(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > >What seems to be happening is that enabling ICS wants to assign the >192.168.0.1 address to the wireless card connected to the DSL gateway, which >already has that address. > >Do you know of any way to make this work? > >I have networked a W2K Pro machine with my XP machine (the host) using a >crossover Ethernet cable (this actually seems to work better without the >crossover cable???), but have so far failed with static addresses on both >machines, bridging, etc. > Is the "dsl gateway" a nat device? If so, uninstall ics because it isn't required. If for some reason bridging doesn't work after this, put the wired and wireless adaptors on different subnets and enable routing between the wired and wireless interfaces as follows System Key: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters] Value Name: IPEnableRouter Data Type: REG_DWORD (DWORD Value) Value Data: (0 = disabled, 1 = enabled) The crossover cable isn't always required if the network adaptors are capable of auto sensing transmission and reception. Jim.
From: Psycho-billy on 15 Nov 2008 20:14 James, Thanks, I did read that my network card could sense a crossover cable, but apparently the one on the W2K machine can't. At any rate, it looks like I don't have ICS installed to begin with, not sure why, but eventually, I'll try this with all that installed. Also have been reading about TCP/IP binding to the two adapters, and my system information is telling me that it too is not set up. The odd thing is that the documentation is supposed to apply to W'98 & ME, yet it's in my Help and Support App. Not sure I should be in the Expert forum, because I need to read up on subnets and masking too. If I work this out, I'll post my solution. Regards, Larry Marquardt -- PB "James Egan" wrote: > > On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:43:01 -0800, Psycho-billy > <Psychobilly(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > > > > >What seems to be happening is that enabling ICS wants to assign the > >192.168.0.1 address to the wireless card connected to the DSL gateway, which > >already has that address. > > > >Do you know of any way to make this work? > > > >I have networked a W2K Pro machine with my XP machine (the host) using a > >crossover Ethernet cable (this actually seems to work better without the > >crossover cable???), but have so far failed with static addresses on both > >machines, bridging, etc. > > > > > Is the "dsl gateway" a nat device? If so, uninstall ics because it > isn't required. If for some reason bridging doesn't work after this, > put the wired and wireless adaptors on different subnets and enable > routing between the wired and wireless interfaces as follows > > System Key: > [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters] > Value Name: IPEnableRouter > Data Type: REG_DWORD (DWORD Value) > Value Data: (0 = disabled, 1 = enabled) > > The crossover cable isn't always required if the network adaptors are > capable of auto sensing transmission and reception. > > > > Jim. > > > >
From: Psycho-billy on 17 Nov 2008 08:46 James, The DSL gateway is a NAT machine. A couple of things on the XP machine: I have the "Allow other network users to connect through this Internet connection" option in the Advanced tab on my network connections (XP Pro), but don't see the service??? "Add Remove Windows Components" does not show "Internet Tools" or any reference to ICS??? The good news is that your key worked fine and I can connect via the LAN to the W2K machine (no crossover cable this time), and can connect to the Internet with the XP machine. I lose connectivity when bridging the LAN and WLAN cards on the XP machine. I am still not able to reach the internet from the W2K machine through the XP Pro machine. I know W2K isn't supported so if the problem is there, I will have to work it out somehow. Regards, Larry Marquardt -- PB "James Egan" wrote: > > On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:43:01 -0800, Psycho-billy > <Psychobilly(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > > > > >What seems to be happening is that enabling ICS wants to assign the > >192.168.0.1 address to the wireless card connected to the DSL gateway, which > >already has that address. > > > >Do you know of any way to make this work? > > > >I have networked a W2K Pro machine with my XP machine (the host) using a > >crossover Ethernet cable (this actually seems to work better without the > >crossover cable???), but have so far failed with static addresses on both > >machines, bridging, etc. > > > > > Is the "dsl gateway" a nat device? If so, uninstall ics because it > isn't required. If for some reason bridging doesn't work after this, > put the wired and wireless adaptors on different subnets and enable > routing between the wired and wireless interfaces as follows > > System Key: > [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters] > Value Name: IPEnableRouter > Data Type: REG_DWORD (DWORD Value) > Value Data: (0 = disabled, 1 = enabled) > > The crossover cable isn't always required if the network adaptors are > capable of auto sensing transmission and reception. > > > > Jim. > > > >
From: James Egan on 17 Nov 2008 11:24 On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 05:46:01 -0800, Psycho-billy <Psychobilly(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >I have the "Allow other network users to connect through this Internet >connection" option in the Advanced tab on my network connections (XP Pro), >but don't see the service??? This is ICS which needs to be UNCHECKED. You also need to set your computer so that it connects to the Internet through a residential gateway (not a direct connection). The network setup wizard might help you through this bit. Also look here for general details. http://www.practicallynetworked.com/sharing/xp_ics/ Once you have this successfully uninstalled and the computer is set to receive its Internet connection via the LAN check that the machine is set to receive an ip address automatically and also you might have to re-make the registry change that I mentioned. If bridging (the easier solution) doesn't work AFTER you have disabled ICS successfully, post back and I'll give you some instructions for connecting using routing. It's a little harder to configure because it entails adding a static route to your dsl gateway. Bridging is known to be a bit temperamental on occasions so don't spend too much time on it if it doesn't work. Jim.
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Networking Next: Intel(R) 82566DM-2 Gigabit Network Connection Link has been discon |