From: Darren Salt on
I demand that Tony Houghton may or may not have written...

> In <4EA654666D%news(a)youmustbejoking.demon.cu.invalid>,
> Darren Salt <news(a)youmustbejoking.demon.cu.invalid> wrote:
>> I demand that Tony Houghton may or may not have written...
[post-plugin config]
>>> I found the windows you meant in the end, I didn't realise they were
>>> accessed in a completely different way from the other preferences.
>> Hmm. Would duplicating them in File->Configure help...?

> They have an effect there (the settings get entered into the
> deinterlacing/postprocessing string options) so it might help understanding
> if the windows to edit the options via the GUI were also accessible from
> there.

They are now... :-)

<URL:http://zap.tartarus.org/~ds/hg/gxine/>

[snip]
> I think the problem was that I ended up with the tvtime plugin enabled both
> in the deinterlacing and postprocessing settings, one I updated to
> Greedy2Frame, the other still on LinearBlend. This seemed to confuse gxine
> as much as gxine had confused me.

Hmm, interesting... not a major problem, but nevertheless something to look
at sometime.

>>> And is gui.post_plugins.deinterlace a synonym for gui.post_plugins.video?
>> No.

> I think there's a case for merging them. The only thing I can see that
> separates deinterlacers from other postprocessing filters (except that it's
> probably a good idea to always deinterlace before anything else) is the
> need for deinterlacing to be turned on and off.

Which is exactly why they're separate.

> As such they just need a flag to identify them as a specialised form of pp
> filter.

That's doable...

> Trying to treat them as a separate type of plugin when they're all also
> available as general pp filters seems to do no more than add potential for
> trouble and confusion.

OTOH, you also get to mix them as you want... I'm inclined to add a flag and
use it as nothing more than a hint.

--
| Darren Salt | linux or ds at | nr. Ashington, | Toon
| RISC OS, Linux | youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | Army
| <URL:http://www.youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk/> (PGP 2.6, GPG keys)

Sorry... my mind has a few bad sectors.
From: Tony Houghton on
In <4EA955474E%news(a)youmustbejoking.demon.cu.invalid>,
Darren Salt <news(a)youmustbejoking.demon.cu.invalid> wrote:

> I demand that Tony Houghton may or may not have written...
>
>> I think the problem was that I ended up with the tvtime plugin enabled both
>> in the deinterlacing and postprocessing settings, one I updated to
>> Greedy2Frame, the other still on LinearBlend. This seemed to confuse gxine
>> as much as gxine had confused me.

Speaking of Greedy2Frame, now that I've managed to enable it I'm not at
all impressed with it after all. I remember reading a message (in the
VDR mailing list IIRC) saying that MPlayer didn't have any good
deinterlacers like Greedy2Frame. However, like xine, MPlayer can use the
ffmpeg one which IME is excellent.

> Hmm, interesting... not a major problem, but nevertheless something to look
> at sometime.
>
>>>> And is gui.post_plugins.deinterlace a synonym for gui.post_plugins.video?
>>> No.
>
>> I think there's a case for merging them. The only thing I can see that
>> separates deinterlacers from other postprocessing filters (except that it's
>> probably a good idea to always deinterlace before anything else) is the
>> need for deinterlacing to be turned on and off.
>
> Which is exactly why they're separate.
>
>> As such they just need a flag to identify them as a specialised form of pp
>> filter.
>
> That's doable...
>
>> Trying to treat them as a separate type of plugin when they're all also
>> available as general pp filters seems to do no more than add potential for
>> trouble and confusion.
>
> OTOH, you also get to mix them as you want... I'm inclined to add a flag and
> use it as nothing more than a hint.

Sounds like you agree with me in a roundabout way :).

BTW, when using "new" style deinterlacing the "i" key doesn't seem to do
anything. Shouldn't it now toggle deint pp filters on and off if
they're being used instead of the old xv deinterlacer?

--
The address in the Reply-To is genuine and should not be edited.
See <http://www.realh.co.uk/contact.html> for more reliable contact addresses.
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Spamcop
Next: Any free plugin to view BBC video clips?