Conroy - Public Enemy #1 - Re: Turn your Rigol DS1052E Oscilloscope into a 100MHz DS1102E
in [Design]
|
From: fritz on 8 Apr 2010 18:06 "brent" <bulegoge(a)columbus.rr.com> wrote in message news:eed0bfad-91dd-4d7a-82d9-dff8c0ca3226(a)r1g2000yqj.googlegroups.com... On Apr 8, 5:07 pm, "fritz" <yapu...(a)microsoft.com> wrote: > I am totally opposed to censorship. > Censorship is a concept that is measured in degrees, not black and >white. To summarize your position by stating that you are completely >against it , demonstrates that you have not really given much thought >to the topic. You are both ignorant AND stupid. Censorship IS black and white, my ignorant AND stupid friend. I have given far more thought to the topic than you have, for many years, you seem to be wet behind the ears, a young fool who has no experience of what censorship really means. You cannot allow ANY government to control the access to information. To do so is to give up your rights, Australia may be going down the same path that will result in Sharia Law if your ideas prevail. The thin edge of the wedge.
From: krw on 8 Apr 2010 18:30 On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 00:06:33 +0200, "fritz" <yaputya(a)microsoft.com> wrote: >"brent" <bulegoge(a)columbus.rr.com> wrote in message >news:eed0bfad-91dd-4d7a-82d9-dff8c0ca3226(a)r1g2000yqj.googlegroups.com... >On Apr 8, 5:07 pm, "fritz" <yapu...(a)microsoft.com> wrote: > >> I am totally opposed to censorship. > >> Censorship is a concept that is measured in degrees, not black and >>white. To summarize your position by stating that you are completely >>against it , demonstrates that you have not really given much thought >>to the topic. > >You are both ignorant AND stupid. Speaking of which, have you looked in a mirror lately, Mr. Pot? >Censorship IS black and white, my ignorant AND stupid friend. >I have given far more thought to the topic than you have, for many >years, you seem to be wet behind the ears, a young fool who has no >experience of what censorship really means. Ignorance personified. >You cannot allow ANY government to control the access to information. >To do so is to give up your rights, Australia may be going down the same >path that will result in Sharia Law if your ideas prevail. >The thin edge of the wedge. Really? You think everyone's personal information should be freely available?
From: brent on 8 Apr 2010 18:41 On Apr 8, 6:06 pm, "fritz" <yapu...(a)microsoft.com> wrote: > "brent" <buleg...(a)columbus.rr.com> wrote in message > > You are both ignorant AND stupid. > Censorship IS black and white, my ignorant AND stupid friend. Calling me ignorant and stupid does not enhance your argument. > I have given far more thought to the topic than you have, for many > years, you seem to be wet behind the ears, a young fool who has no > experience of what censorship really means. If you have thought about this for many years and come to the conclusion that you are totally opposed [to all government] censorship then you are not very bright. > You cannot allow ANY government to control the access to information. That is so silly as to be laughable. Access to information is controlled all the time. For instance, I am not going to have access to nuclear launch codes. If I have a Top Secret Security Clearance I am automatically going along with the concept of government censorship and not pass along government information to others. When a person enters an airport they are immediately in a censored state. Perhaps you think that every single person SHOULD be allowed to go into an airplane and start saying whatever they want like "I have a bomb", but that will pretty much get you tossed in prison without very many people (except perhaps you) wringing their hands about excessive government censorship. And to think you have spent countless years thinking about this stuff and none of these simple ideas ever crossed your mind???? I have only been thinking about this for a few hours and already I can realize that no government censorship at all is a really really simple minded idea. > To do so is to give up your rights, Australia may be going down the same > path that will result in Sharia Law if your ideas prevail. > The thin edge of the wedge.
From: fritz on 8 Apr 2010 18:55 <krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message news:44msr5d5rdss6t3fdq3hsk8qlo58p3qmj8(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 00:06:33 +0200, "fritz" <yaputya(a)microsoft.com> wrote: > >>"brent" <bulegoge(a)columbus.rr.com> wrote in message >>news:eed0bfad-91dd-4d7a-82d9-dff8c0ca3226(a)r1g2000yqj.googlegroups.com... >>On Apr 8, 5:07 pm, "fritz" <yapu...(a)microsoft.com> wrote: >> >>> I am totally opposed to censorship. >> >>> Censorship is a concept that is measured in degrees, not black and >>>white. To summarize your position by stating that you are completely >>>against it , demonstrates that you have not really given much thought >>>to the topic. >> >>You are both ignorant AND stupid. > > Speaking of which, have you looked in a mirror lately, Mr. Pot? You are both ignorant AND stupid. Probably a stupid Xtian to boot!! > >>Censorship IS black and white, my ignorant AND stupid friend. >>I have given far more thought to the topic than you have, for many >>years, you seem to be wet behind the ears, a young fool who has no >>experience of what censorship really means. > > Ignorance personified. Read it AGAIN and weep, YOU ARE THE ignorant fool. >>You cannot allow ANY government to control the access to information. >>To do so is to give up your rights, Australia may be going down the same >>path that will result in Sharia Law if your ideas prevail. >>The thin edge of the wedge. > > Really? You think everyone's personal information should be freely > available? I thought you were just stupid, now I AM SURE YOU ARE AN IDIOT: read AGAIN WHAT I HAVE POSTED AND YOUR STUPID RESPONSE:
From: brent on 8 Apr 2010 19:08
On Apr 8, 6:55 pm, "fritz" <yapu...(a)microsoft.com> wrote: > <k...(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message > > news:44msr5d5rdss6t3fdq3hsk8qlo58p3qmj8(a)4ax.com... > > > > > On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 00:06:33 +0200, "fritz" <yapu...(a)microsoft.com> wrote: > > >>"brent" <buleg...(a)columbus.rr.com> wrote in message > >>news:eed0bfad-91dd-4d7a-82d9-dff8c0ca3226(a)r1g2000yqj.googlegroups.com.... > >>On Apr 8, 5:07 pm, "fritz" <yapu...(a)microsoft.com> wrote: > > >>> I am totally opposed to censorship. > > >>> Censorship is a concept that is measured in degrees, not black and > >>>white. To summarize your position by stating that you are completely > >>>against it , demonstrates that you have not really given much thought > >>>to the topic. > > >>You are both ignorant AND stupid. > > > Speaking of which, have you looked in a mirror lately, Mr. Pot? > > You are both ignorant AND stupid. > Probably a stupid Xtian to boot!! > I do not know what a Xtian is. So I cannot say. But your strategy for argument seems to be to take an extreme position and then call anyone who tries to point out the inconsistencies you extreme position silly names. > > > >>Censorship IS black and white, my ignorant AND stupid friend. > >>I have given far more thought to the topic than you have, for many > >>years, you seem to be wet behind the ears, a young fool who has no > >>experience of what censorship really means. > > > Ignorance personified. > > Read it AGAIN and weep, YOU ARE THE ignorant fool. > Name calling. In capital letters to boot! > >>You cannot allow ANY government to control the access to information. > >>To do so is to give up your rights, Australia may be going down the same > >>path that will result in Sharia Law if your ideas prevail. > >>The thin edge of the wedge. > > > Really? You think everyone's personal information should be freely > > available? > > I thought you were just stupid, now I AM SURE YOU ARE AN IDIOT: > read AGAIN WHAT I HAVE POSTED AND YOUR STUPID RESPONSE: I see your argument style. Step one: call person fool in mostly lower case letters Step 2. Call them fool in a fair amount of upper case letters Step 3. Call them idiot in all upper case letters Can't say its an original argument style. But it is pretty unique on this board. |